EPHE vs. USO
EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EPHE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPHE returned -3.22%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for USO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPHE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
EPHE vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 98.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EPHE has underperformed USO with an annualized return of -3.22%, while USO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.80% annualized return.
EPHE
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- -9.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.06%
- 10Y*
- -3.22%
USO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 98.48%
- 6M
- 95.54%
- 1Y
- 97.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
EPHE vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | -1.36% | 1.56% | -1.41% | 1.27% | -15.87% | -2.23% | -3.95% | 8.50% | -17.50% | 20.20% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 98.48% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPHE and USO is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.19 |
The correlation between EPHE and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPHE vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
EPHE
USO
EPHE vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPHE | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | 2.22 | -2.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | 2.81 | -3.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.37 | -0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 5.12 | -5.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 9.66 | -10.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPHE | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | 2.22 | -2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.67 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.15 | 0.10 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | -0.18 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
EPHE vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPHE | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -98.19% | +44.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.22% | -20.39% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -26.05% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.96% | -36.23% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.62% | -86.75% | +35.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.78% | -85.39% | +50.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -75.30% | +54.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.04% | 10.81% | -1.77% |
Volatility
EPHE vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) is 5.60%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that EPHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPHE | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 15.03% | -9.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 38.18% | -24.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 44.26% | -25.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 36.04% | -17.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 39.00% | -16.76% |
EPHE vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPHE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPHE vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.14% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.73% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.03% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPHE and USO have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to EPHE (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPHE dropped -53.82% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 10-year performance, USO leads with 3.80% vs -3.22% for EPHE. On fees, EPHE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EPHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USO has performed better with a 3.80% return vs -3.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPHE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
EPHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
EPHE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPHE and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPHE and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer