EPHE vs. OILK
EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPHE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPHE returned -3.06%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for OILK. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPHE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
EPHE vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.95% return.
EPHE
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- -9.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.06%
- 10Y*
- -3.22%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 61.95%
- 6M
- 59.31%
- 1Y
- 57.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- —
EPHE vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | -1.36% | 1.56% | -1.41% | 1.27% | -15.87% | -2.23% | -3.95% | 8.50% | -17.50% | 20.20% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 61.95% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPHE and OILK is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.11 |
The correlation between EPHE and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPHE vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPHE
OILK
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Industrials
EPHE
OILK
-
Financial Services
EPHE
OILK
-
Utilities
EPHE
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
EPHE
OILK
Real Estate
EPHE
OILK
-
Communication Services
EPHE
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
EPHE
OILK
-
Energy
EPHE
OILK
-
Basic Materials
EPHE
OILK
-
Healthcare
EPHE
-
OILK
-
Technology
EPHE
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPHE vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
EPHE
OILK
EPHE vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPHE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | 2.03 | -2.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | 2.55 | -3.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.34 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 3.61 | -4.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 7.33 | -8.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPHE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | 2.03 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.59 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.11 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
EPHE vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPHE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -83.76% | +29.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.22% | -17.35% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -23.42% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.96% | -34.69% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.78% | -4.99% | -29.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -32.62% | +11.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.04% | 8.56% | +0.48% |
Volatility
EPHE vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) is 5.60%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that EPHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPHE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 11.11% | -5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 23.24% | -9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 28.86% | -9.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 30.11% | -12.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 35.98% | -13.74% |
EPHE vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPHE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPHE vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than OILK's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.14% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.73% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.03% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.29% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPHE and OILK have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to EPHE (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPHE dropped -53.82% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.52% vs -3.06% for EPHE. On fees, EPHE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EPHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.52% return vs -3.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPHE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 2.14% for EPHE.
EPHE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPHE and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPHE and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer