EPHE vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPHE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPHE returned -3.20%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for IWM. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPHE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

EPHE vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EPHE has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of -3.20%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.

EPHE

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: -1.12%
• 6M: 0.64%
• 1Y: -9.52%
• 3Y*: 0.24%
• 5Y*: -3.12%
• 10Y*: -3.20%

IWM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPHE vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF	-1.12%	1.56%	-1.41%	1.27%	-15.87%	-2.23%	-3.95%	8.50%	-17.50%	20.20%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	17.07%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	20.03%	25.39%	-11.12%	14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EPHE and IWM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010	0.43

The correlation between EPHE and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EPHE vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPHE	IWM
Industrials	32.0%	17.1%
Financial Services	17.3%	15.8%
Utilities	14.3%	3.0%
Consumer Cyclical	13.6%	7.8%
Real Estate	10.7%	5.7%
Communication Services	5.3%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	2.1%
Energy	1.3%	6.0%
Basic Materials	1.0%	4.5%
Healthcare	-	15.8%
Technology	-	19.5%

Return for Risk

EPHE vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPHE

EPHE Risk / Return Rank: 4
EPHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
EPHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
EPHE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
EPHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
EPHE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPHE vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPHE	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	2.05	-2.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.62	2.85	-3.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.34	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	3.56	-4.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.05	12.64	-13.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPHE vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPHE Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPHE and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPHE	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51	2.05	-2.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	0.27	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.14	0.48	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.37	-0.32

Drawdowns

EPHE vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPHE	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.82%	-59.05%	+5.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.22%	-11.03%	-5.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.42%	-27.50%	+6.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.96%	-31.91%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.62%	-41.13%	-10.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.62%	-1.49%	-33.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.98%	-10.77%	-10.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.08%	3.10%	+5.98%

Volatility

EPHE vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 5.60% and 5.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPHE	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.60%	5.75%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.77%	13.53%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.87%	19.20%	-0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.05%	22.52%	-4.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.24%	23.04%	-0.80%

EPHE vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPHE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPHE vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF	2.13%	2.11%	2.32%	2.01%	1.73%	1.05%	0.72%	0.78%	0.45%	0.36%	0.71%	1.03%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPHE and IWM in my portfolio?

EPHE and IWM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPHE or IWM?

IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to EPHE (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPHE dropped -53.82% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, EPHE or IWM?

On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.93% vs -3.20% for EPHE. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EPHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPHE or IWM?

Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.93% return vs -3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPHE or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPHE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPHE or IWM?

EPHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

What is the main difference between EPHE and IWM?

EPHE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPHE and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.