EPHE vs. HIDR.L
EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) and HIDR.L (HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EPHE tracks the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index while HIDR.L tracks the MSCI Indonesia NR IDR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPHE returned -2.82%/yr vs -3.29%/yr for HIDR.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPHE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HIDR.L.
Performance
EPHE vs. HIDR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EPHE is traded in USD, while HIDR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HIDR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than HIDR.L's -36.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EPHE has outperformed HIDR.L with an annualized return of -2.82%, while HIDR.L has yielded a comparatively lower -3.29% annualized return.
EPHE
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- -7.80%
- 3Y*
- 0.90%
- 5Y*
- -3.02%
- 10Y*
- -2.82%
HIDR.L
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -36.24%
- 6M
- -36.19%
- 1Y
- -37.53%
- 3Y*
- -19.81%
- 5Y*
- -8.95%
- 10Y*
- -3.29%
EPHE vs. HIDR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 0.32% | 1.56% | -1.41% | 1.27% | -15.87% | -2.23% | -3.95% | 8.50% | -17.50% | 20.20% |
HIDR.L HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD | -36.24% | -1.20% | -14.61% | 4.43% | 3.09% | 1.47% | -8.00% | 8.24% | -9.58% | 23.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPHE and HIDR.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011 | 0.40 |
The correlation between EPHE and HIDR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPHE vs. HIDR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPHE
HIDR.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Industrials
EPHE
HIDR.L
Financial Services
EPHE
HIDR.L
Utilities
EPHE
HIDR.L
Consumer Cyclical
EPHE
HIDR.L
-
Real Estate
EPHE
HIDR.L
-
Communication Services
EPHE
HIDR.L
Consumer Defensive
EPHE
HIDR.L
Energy
EPHE
HIDR.L
Basic Materials
EPHE
HIDR.L
Healthcare
EPHE
-
HIDR.L
-
Technology
EPHE
-
HIDR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPHE vs. HIDR.L — Risk / Return Rank
EPHE
HIDR.L
EPHE vs. HIDR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPHE | HIDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.74 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.79 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | -2.30 | +1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPHE vs. HIDR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, smaller than the maximum HIDR.L drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and HIDR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPHE | HIDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -58.15% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.90% | -48.66% | +32.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -58.13% | +36.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.96% | -58.13% | +25.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.62% | -58.13% | +6.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.66% | -50.90% | +17.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.00% | -18.92% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.28% | 16.73% | -7.45% |
Volatility
EPHE vs. HIDR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) is 4.96%, while HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) has a volatility of 15.37%. This indicates that EPHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIDR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPHE | HIDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 15.37% | -10.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 24.62% | -11.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 28.01% | -9.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 21.84% | -3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 24.76% | -2.56% |
EPHE vs. HIDR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPHE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDR.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPHE vs. HIDR.L - Dividend Comparison
EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than HIDR.L's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.73% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.03% |
HIDR.L HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD | 5.93% | 4.87% | 3.49% | 3.49% | 2.04% | 1.27% | 1.75% | 1.62% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.12% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPHE and HIDR.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HIDR.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HIDR.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPHE.
EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while HIDR.L tracks MSCI Indonesia NR IDR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPHE and 0.50% for HIDR.L.
Find the right allocation for EPHE and HIDR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer