PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPHE vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPHE vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 68.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EPHE has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of -3.20%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.90% annualized return.


EPHE

1D
0.24%
1M
1.36%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
0.64%
1Y
-9.52%
3Y*
0.24%
5Y*
-3.12%
10Y*
-3.20%

EWT

1D
-0.20%
1M
18.24%
YTD
68.27%
6M
72.42%
1Y
110.37%
3Y*
38.34%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
19.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPHE vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPHE
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF
-1.12%1.56%-1.41%1.27%-15.87%-2.23%-3.95%8.50%-17.50%20.20%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
68.27%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EPHE and EWT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.50

The correlation between EPHE and EWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EPHE vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPHE
EWT

Industrials

32.0%
4.9%

Financial Services

17.3%
13.0%

Utilities

14.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
1.9%

Real Estate

10.7%

-

Communication Services

5.3%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
1.1%

Energy

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%
3.5%

Healthcare

-

0.8%

Technology

-

72.9%

Industrials

EPHE
32.0%
EWT
4.9%

Financial Services

EPHE
17.3%
EWT
13.0%

Utilities

EPHE
14.3%
EWT

-

Consumer Cyclical

EPHE
13.6%
EWT
1.9%

Real Estate

EPHE
10.7%
EWT

-

Communication Services

EPHE
5.3%
EWT
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

EPHE
4.6%
EWT
1.1%

Energy

EPHE
1.3%
EWT

-

Basic Materials

EPHE
1.0%
EWT
3.5%

Healthcare

EPHE

-

EWT
0.8%

Technology

EPHE

-

EWT
72.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPHE vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPHE
EPHE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
EPHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPHE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
EPHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPHE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPHE vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPHEEWTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.51

4.42

-4.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.62

5.00

-5.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.69

-0.76

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

10.56

-11.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.05

32.40

-33.45

EPHE vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPHE Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 4.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPHE and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPHEEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

4.42

-4.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.82

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

0.92

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.26

-0.21

Drawdowns

EPHE vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPHEEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.82%

-64.37%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.22%

-10.51%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.42%

-25.66%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.96%

-38.88%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.62%

-38.88%

-12.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.62%

-0.20%

-34.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.98%

-19.23%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.08%

3.42%

+5.66%

Volatility

EPHE vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) is 5.60%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that EPHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPHEEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

10.43%

-4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.77%

20.52%

-6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.87%

25.10%

-6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.05%

22.59%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

21.60%

+0.64%

EPHE vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EPHE and EWT have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

EPHE vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than EWT's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPHE
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF
2.13%2.11%2.32%2.01%1.73%1.05%0.72%0.78%0.45%0.36%0.71%1.03%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.63%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPHE and EWT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to EPHE (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPHE dropped -53.82% vs EWT's -64.37%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.90% vs -3.20% for EPHE. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EPHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.90% return vs -3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPHE and EWT have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 2.13% for EPHE.

EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPHE and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer