EPGIX vs. FKRCX
EPGIX (EuroPac Gold Fund Class I) and FKRCX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund) are both Gold funds. Over the past 5 years, EPGIX returned 12.62%/yr vs 19.32%/yr for FKRCX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPGIX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FKRCX.
Performance
EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPGIX achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly higher than FKRCX's -11.18% return.
EPGIX
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -14.07%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -12.45%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 31.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- —
FKRCX
- 1D
- -4.63%
- 1M
- -17.01%
- YTD
- -11.18%
- 6M
- -14.25%
- 1Y
- 61.63%
- 3Y*
- 47.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGIX EuroPac Gold Fund Class I | -9.21% | 129.72% | 8.80% | 2.51% | -13.84% | -17.82% | 37.43% | 37.47% | 5.95% |
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund | -11.18% | 196.59% | 17.64% | 2.03% | -23.47% | -4.03% | 44.30% | 51.48% | 7.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPGIX and FKRCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between EPGIX and FKRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPGIX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank
EPGIX
FKRCX
EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund Class I (EPGIX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPGIX | FKRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.74 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.70 | 4.68 | -0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPGIX drawdown since its inception was -50.71%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGIX and FKRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPGIX | FKRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.71% | -78.85% | +28.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.79% | -34.78% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.79% | -34.78% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.85% | -48.79% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.79% | -33.99% | +3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.64% | -33.73% | +15.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.91% | 12.93% | -1.02% |
Volatility
EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EuroPac Gold Fund Class I (EPGIX) is 15.13%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 17.83%. This indicates that EPGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPGIX | FKRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.13% | 17.83% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.22% | 38.33% | -4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.66% | 44.73% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 34.45% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.03% | 33.16% | +0.87% |
EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPGIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison
EPGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, less than FKRCX's 12.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGIX EuroPac Gold Fund Class I | 7.67% | 6.96% | 10.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.76% | 8.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund | 12.10% | 10.75% | 13.44% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 9.37% | 10.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 8.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EPGIX and FKRCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FKRCX has higher volatility (17.83%) compared to EPGIX (15.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPGIX dropped -50.71% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.
FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPGIX and FKRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer