PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPGIX vs. FKRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EuroPac Gold Fund Class I (EPGIX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPGIX achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly higher than FKRCX's -11.18% return.


EPGIX

1D
-3.92%
1M
-14.07%
YTD
-9.21%
6M
-12.45%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
31.18%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*

FKRCX

1D
-4.63%
1M
-17.01%
YTD
-11.18%
6M
-14.25%
1Y
61.63%
3Y*
47.42%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EPGIX
EuroPac Gold Fund Class I
-9.21%129.72%8.80%2.51%-13.84%-17.82%37.43%37.47%5.95%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
-11.18%196.59%17.64%2.03%-23.47%-4.03%44.30%51.48%7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EPGIX and FKRCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2018

0.93

The correlation between EPGIX and FKRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPGIX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPGIX
EPGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EPGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EPGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund Class I (EPGIX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPGIXFKRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.74

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

4.68

-0.98

EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPGIX and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPGIX drawdown since its inception was -50.71%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGIX and FKRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPGIXFKRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.71%

-78.85%

+28.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.79%

-34.78%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.79%

-34.78%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.85%

-48.79%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.79%

-33.99%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.64%

-33.73%

+15.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.91%

12.93%

-1.02%

Volatility

EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EuroPac Gold Fund Class I (EPGIX) is 15.13%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 17.83%. This indicates that EPGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPGIXFKRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.13%

17.83%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.22%

38.33%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.66%

44.73%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.90%

34.45%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.03%

33.16%

+0.87%

EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPGIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPGIX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

EPGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, less than FKRCX's 12.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EPGIX
EuroPac Gold Fund Class I
7.67%6.96%10.56%0.00%0.00%2.76%8.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
12.10%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EPGIX and FKRCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FKRCX has higher volatility (17.83%) compared to EPGIX (15.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPGIX dropped -50.71% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPGIX and FKRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer