PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPGFX vs. SGDLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPGFX achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than SGDLX's 0.53% return.


EPGFX

1D
-3.78%
1M
0.69%
YTD
2.99%
6M
8.21%
1Y
59.23%
3Y*
33.97%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
12.45%

SGDLX

1D
-3.24%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.53%
6M
9.30%
1Y
61.55%
3Y*
41.87%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EPGFX
EuroPac Gold Fund
2.99%129.06%8.51%2.31%-14.00%-18.06%37.78%
SGDLX
Sprott Gold Equity Fund
0.53%147.67%20.58%1.91%-13.21%-11.79%35.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EPGFX and SGDLX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020

0.96

The correlation between EPGFX and SGDLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPGFX vs. SGDLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPGFX
EPGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EPGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
EPGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDLX
SGDLX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SGDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPGFXSGDLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.17

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

5.46

+0.53

EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SGDLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPGFX and SGDLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPGFXSGDLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.56

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.58

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.59

-0.25

Drawdowns

EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPGFX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than SGDLX's maximum drawdown of -47.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGFX and SGDLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPGFXSGDLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-47.59%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.88%

-28.77%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.88%

-28.77%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.20%

-42.98%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.47%

-24.32%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.03%

-18.29%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.26%

11.42%

-1.16%

Volatility

EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) is 12.90%, while Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that EPGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPGFXSGDLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.90%

13.73%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.94%

33.70%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.64%

40.11%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.52%

31.60%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.43%

33.88%

-1.45%

EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPGFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDLX's 1.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Dividend Comparison

EPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than SGDLX's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EPGFX
EuroPac Gold Fund
6.66%6.86%10.36%0.00%0.00%2.49%8.67%0.00%0.00%2.56%19.31%
SGDLX
Sprott Gold Equity Fund
0.66%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, EPGFX and SGDLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SGDLX has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to EPGFX (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPGFX dropped -56.70% vs SGDLX's -47.59%.

EPGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPGFX and SGDLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer