EPGFX vs. SGDLX
EPGFX (EuroPac Gold Fund) and SGDLX (Sprott Gold Equity Fund) are both Precious Metals funds. Over the past 5 years, EPGFX returned 12.77%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for SGDLX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EPGFX charges 1.40%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for SGDLX.
Performance
EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPGFX achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than SGDLX's 0.53% return.
EPGFX
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 59.23%
- 3Y*
- 33.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
SGDLX
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 61.55%
- 3Y*
- 41.87%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- —
EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | 2.99% | 129.06% | 8.51% | 2.31% | -14.00% | -18.06% | 37.78% |
SGDLX Sprott Gold Equity Fund | 0.53% | 147.67% | 20.58% | 1.91% | -13.21% | -11.79% | 35.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPGFX and SGDLX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between EPGFX and SGDLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPGFX vs. SGDLX — Risk / Return Rank
EPGFX
SGDLX
EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPGFX | SGDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.17 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 5.46 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPGFX | SGDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.56 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.58 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.59 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPGFX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than SGDLX's maximum drawdown of -47.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGFX and SGDLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPGFX | SGDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -47.59% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.88% | -28.77% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.88% | -28.77% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.20% | -42.98% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.47% | -24.32% | +2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -18.29% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.26% | 11.42% | -1.16% |
Volatility
EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) is 12.90%, while Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that EPGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPGFX | SGDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 13.73% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.94% | 33.70% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.64% | 40.11% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.52% | 31.60% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.43% | 33.88% | -1.45% |
EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPGFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDLX's 1.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPGFX vs. SGDLX - Dividend Comparison
EPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than SGDLX's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | 6.66% | 6.86% | 10.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.49% | 8.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 19.31% |
SGDLX Sprott Gold Equity Fund | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, EPGFX and SGDLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SGDLX has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to EPGFX (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPGFX dropped -56.70% vs SGDLX's -47.59%.
EPGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPGFX and SGDLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer