EPGCX vs. BLUEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX).
EPGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991.
Performance
EPGCX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPGCX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGCX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C | -9.51% | 13.38% | 9.87% | 34.16% | -25.24% | 21.72% | 42.18% | 32.59% | -0.65% | 33.80% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -9.67% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EPGCX having a -9.51% return and BLUEX slightly lower at -9.67%. Over the past 10 years, EPGCX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 13.56%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.23% annualized return.
EPGCX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- -9.51%
- 6M
- -9.01%
- 1Y
- 12.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
BLUEX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -7.41%
- YTD
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -9.53%
- 1Y
- -8.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPGCX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPGCX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPGCX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
EPGCX
BLUEX
EPGCX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPGCX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | -0.79 | +1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | -1.07 | +2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.87 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | -0.76 | +1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.53 | -2.67 | +5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPGCX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | -0.79 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.05 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.56 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.49 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPGCX and BLUEX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EPGCX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
EPGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than BLUEX's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGCX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C | 0.97% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 2.99% | 15.94% | 14.57% | 11.69% | 8.45% | 13.66% | 7.31% | 2.67% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
EPGCX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPGCX drawdown since its inception was -65.66%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGCX and BLUEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPGCX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.66% | -54.27% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -12.19% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.74% | -21.87% | -11.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.74% | -29.06% | -4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.97% | -11.55% | -4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.04% | -13.39% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 3.48% | +0.22% |
Volatility
EPGCX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.41%. This indicates that EPGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPGCX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 3.41% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 7.23% | +5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 10.98% | +10.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 10.49% | +10.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 16.57% | +4.43% |