PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPGCX vs. AMRGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPGCX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPGCX achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's 18.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EPGCX has outperformed AMRGX with an annualized return of 16.12%, while AMRGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.23% annualized return.


EPGCX

1D
0.39%
1M
7.21%
YTD
14.97%
6M
14.30%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
16.12%

AMRGX

1D
1.75%
1M
7.84%
YTD
18.37%
6M
16.83%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPGCX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPGCX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C
14.97%13.38%9.87%34.16%-25.24%21.72%42.18%32.59%-0.65%33.80%
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
18.37%11.18%16.61%24.38%-19.93%15.64%18.65%36.73%-9.07%13.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EPGCX and AMRGX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

0.84

The correlation between EPGCX and AMRGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPGCX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPGCX
EPGCX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EPGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EPGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AMRGX
AMRGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AMRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AMRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPGCX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPGCXAMRGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.83

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

6.90

+1.97

EPGCX vs. AMRGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPGCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the AMRGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPGCX and AMRGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPGCXAMRGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.47

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.48

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.57

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.12

+0.34

Drawdowns

EPGCX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPGCX drawdown since its inception was -65.66%, smaller than the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGCX and AMRGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPGCXAMRGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.66%

-80.32%

+14.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-13.98%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.74%

-21.15%

-12.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.74%

-35.42%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

-35.42%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.95%

-40.25%

+22.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

5.66%

-2.23%

Volatility

EPGCX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) is 4.17%, while American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that EPGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPGCXAMRGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

6.47%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

24.98%

-12.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

26.89%

-10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.28%

22.21%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

21.50%

-0.39%

EPGCX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPGCX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPGCX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison

EPGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than AMRGX's 15.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
15.06%17.82%12.39%8.17%7.77%12.21%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPGCX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C
0.77%0.88%0.00%0.75%2.99%15.94%14.57%11.69%8.45%13.66%7.31%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPGCX and AMRGX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMRGX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to EPGCX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPGCX dropped -65.66% vs AMRGX's -80.32%.

EPGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPGCX and AMRGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer