EPGAX vs. MRFOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX).
EPGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. MRFOX is managed by Marshfield. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015.
Performance
EPGAX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPGAX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A | -5.44% | 14.27% | 15.57% | 35.25% | -24.67% | 22.66% | 43.38% | 33.69% | -0.04% | 34.83% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | -2.97% | 10.05% | 17.10% | 17.68% | 5.06% | 17.71% | 15.19% | 36.26% | 1.89% | 25.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPGAX achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly lower than MRFOX's -2.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EPGAX having a 15.41% annualized return and MRFOX not far behind at 15.31%.
EPGAX
- 1D
- 4.33%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -4.99%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
MRFOX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -2.97%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPGAX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPGAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPGAX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank
EPGAX
MRFOX
EPGAX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPGAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.33 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 0.57 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.07 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.68 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 1.75 | +3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPGAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.33 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.92 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 1.07 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.06 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPGAX and MRFOX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EPGAX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison
EPGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than MRFOX's 1.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A | 0.66% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.56% | 2.26% | 12.86% | 12.06% | 9.56% | 7.10% | 12.35% | 6.39% | 2.37% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | 1.67% | 1.62% | 4.59% | 0.46% | 0.35% | 6.78% | 2.68% | 1.39% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EPGAX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPGAX drawdown since its inception was -63.20%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGAX and MRFOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPGAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.20% | -29.10% | -34.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -7.09% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.60% | -12.98% | -17.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.17% | -29.10% | -2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.89% | -5.32% | -3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.32% | -2.37% | -13.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.77% | +0.89% |
Volatility
EPGAX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 3.04%. This indicates that EPGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPGAX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 3.04% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 7.08% | +6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.88% | 11.83% | +10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 12.04% | +8.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 14.29% | +6.48% |