EPEM vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EPEM (Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EPEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Harbor, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. EPEM is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, EPEM returned 44.02% vs 37.25% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. EPEM charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

EPEM vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPEM achieves a 23.73% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 43.93% return.

EPEM

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 25.59%
• 1Y: 44.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: -4.15%
• 1M: -21.96%
• YTD: 43.93%
• 6M: 41.96%
• 1Y: 37.25%
• 3Y*: 12.72%
• 5Y*: 9.10%
• 10Y*: 8.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPEM vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	23.73%	20.73%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	43.93%	-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EPEM and DBO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

EPEM vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPEM

EPEM Risk / Return Rank: 74
EPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
EPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 32
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPEM vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPEM	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.09	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	1.65	+1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.20	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	1.43	+1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.97	4.33	+7.64

EPEM vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPEM and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPEM vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPEM drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPEM and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPEM	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-90.18%	+76.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.27%	-26.22%	+12.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.10%	-62.12%	+56.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-62.22%	+60.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	8.63%	-4.94%

Volatility

EPEM vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) have volatilities of 10.68% and 10.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPEM	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.68%	10.78%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.89%	29.70%	-10.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.19%	34.63%	-13.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.88%	32.59%	-11.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.88%	31.84%	-10.96%

EPEM vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPEM has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPEM vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

EPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than DBO's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	2.44%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.96%	3.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPEM and DBO in my portfolio?

EPEM and DBO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPEM or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to EPEM (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPEM dropped -13.27% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, EPEM or DBO?

On 1-year performance, EPEM leads with 44.02% vs 37.25% for DBO. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, EPEM has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPEM or DBO?

Over the 1-year period, EPEM has performed better with a 44.02% return vs 37.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPEM or DBO?

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPEM or DBO?

EPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.44% for DBO.

What is the main difference between EPEM and DBO?

EPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for EPEM and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.