EPEM vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EPEM (Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Harbor, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EPEM returned 44.02% vs 5.30% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. EPEM charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

EPEM vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPEM achieves a 23.73% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.46% return.

EPEM

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 25.59%
• 1Y: 44.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACLO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPEM vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	23.73%	20.73%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.46%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EPEM and ACLO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

EPEM vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPEM

EPEM Risk / Return Rank: 74
EPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
EPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPEM vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPEM	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	7.32	-5.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	15.12	-12.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	3.44	-2.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	19.85	-16.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.97	165.43	-153.46

EPEM vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPEM and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPEM vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPEM drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPEM and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPEM	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-1.01%	-12.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.27%	-0.27%	-13.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.10%	0.00%	-6.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-0.04%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	0.03%	+3.66%

Volatility

EPEM vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.19%. This indicates that EPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPEM	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.68%	0.19%	+10.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.89%	0.58%	+18.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.19%	0.73%	+20.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.88%	1.07%	+19.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.88%	1.07%	+19.81%

EPEM vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPEM has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPEM vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

EPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than ACLO's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.90%	4.87%	0.59%
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.96%	3.66%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPEM and ACLO in my portfolio?

EPEM and ACLO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPEM or ACLO?

EPEM has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to ACLO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPEM dropped -13.27% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, EPEM or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, EPEM leads with 44.02% vs 5.30% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPEM or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, EPEM has performed better with a 44.02% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPEM or ACLO?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPEM or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.96% for EPEM.

What is the main difference between EPEM and ACLO?

EPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for EPEM and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.32 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.