EPASX vs. EPGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (EPASX) and EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX).
EPASX is managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010. EPGFX is managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management. It was launched on Jul 18, 2013.
Performance
EPASX vs. EPGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPASX vs. EPGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPASX EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | 0.17% | 25.43% | 0.64% | 7.15% | -28.73% | 9.75% | 27.20% | 14.82% | -21.57% | 34.40% |
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | -1.16% | 129.06% | 8.51% | 2.31% | -14.00% | -18.06% | 36.99% | 37.25% | -13.85% | 12.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPASX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than EPGFX's -1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EPASX has underperformed EPGFX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while EPGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.
EPASX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
EPGFX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -24.63%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 80.88%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPASX vs. EPGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPASX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EPGFX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPASX vs. EPGFX — Risk / Return Rank
EPASX
EPGFX
EPASX vs. EPGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (EPASX) and EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPASX | EPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 2.10 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 2.37 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.69 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 10.73 | -3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPASX | EPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.10 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.49 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.46 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.33 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPASX and EPGFX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EPASX vs. EPGFX - Dividend Comparison
EPASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than EPGFX's 6.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPASX EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | 1.95% | 1.95% | 2.00% | 1.20% | 0.50% | 21.67% | 0.54% | 0.27% | 11.18% | 4.20% | 1.50% | 1.30% |
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | 6.94% | 6.86% | 10.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.49% | 8.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 19.31% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EPASX vs. EPGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPASX drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, smaller than the maximum EPGFX drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPASX and EPGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPASX | EPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -56.70% | +15.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -28.88% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.01% | -47.59% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | -51.03% | +9.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.93% | -24.63% | +14.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -22.10% | +6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 7.25% | -4.50% |
Volatility
EPASX vs. EPGFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (EPASX) is 6.32%, while EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) has a volatility of 14.63%. This indicates that EPASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPASX | EPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 14.63% | -8.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 31.74% | -21.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.24% | 38.55% | -25.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 32.01% | -17.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 32.58% | -17.47% |