EOSU vs. LINT
EOSU (T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EOSU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EOSU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
EOSU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EOSU
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 46.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINT
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 549.02%
- 6M
- 433.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EOSU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EOSU T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF | -92.95% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 284.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between EOSU and LINT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EOSU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF (EOSU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EOSU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 22.52 | -22.90 |
Drawdowns
EOSU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EOSU drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOSU and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EOSU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.44% | -49.54% | -47.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.60% | -28.08% | -65.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.71% | -20.57% | -59.14% |
Volatility
EOSU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EOSU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 262.56% | 162.52% | +100.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 262.56% | 162.52% | +100.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 262.56% | 162.52% | +100.04% |
EOSU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EOSU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
EOSU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
EOSU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EOSU T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.13% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EOSU and LINT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for EOSU.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for EOSU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for EOSU and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for EOSU and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer