EOSU vs. COTG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EOSU (T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EOSU is passively managed, while COTG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. EOSU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.

Performance

EOSU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF (EOSU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EOSU

• 1D: -2.96%
• 1M: 46.38%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COTG

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: -9.84%
• YTD: 20.04%
• 6M: 10.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOSU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EOSU T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF	-92.95%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	-0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EOSU and COTG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	-0.18

Return for Risk

EOSU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF (EOSU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EOSU	COTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.38	-0.21	-0.17

Drawdowns

EOSU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOSU drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOSU and COTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EOSU	COTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.44%	-25.69%	-71.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.60%	-21.71%	-71.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.71%	-8.42%	-71.29%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EOSU	COTG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	262.56%	40.63%	+221.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	262.56%	40.63%	+221.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	262.56%	40.63%	+221.93%

EOSU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOSU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EOSU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither EOSU nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EOSU and COTG in my portfolio?

EOSU and COTG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EOSU or COTG?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EOSU or COTG?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for EOSU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EOSU or COTG?

EOSU and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EOSU and COTG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for EOSU and 0.75% for COTG.