EOSU vs. ARMG
EOSU (T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EOSU is passively managed, while ARMG is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EOSU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
EOSU vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EOSU
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 46.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMG
- 1D
- -9.19%
- 1M
- 211.14%
- YTD
- 841.05%
- 6M
- 460.44%
- 1Y
- 443.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EOSU vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EOSU T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF | -92.95% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 931.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between EOSU and ARMG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EOSU vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
EOSU
ARMG
EOSU vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF (EOSU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EOSU | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 1.10 | -1.49 |
Drawdowns
EOSU vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EOSU drawdown since its inception was -97.44%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOSU and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EOSU | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.44% | -80.28% | -17.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.60% | -9.19% | -84.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.71% | -52.91% | -26.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 38.55% | — |
Volatility
EOSU vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EOSU | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 66.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 104.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 262.56% | 130.67% | +131.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 262.56% | 138.36% | +124.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 262.56% | 138.36% | +124.20% |
EOSU vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EOSU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EOSU vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
EOSU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.52% | 4.86% |
EOSU T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EOSU and ARMG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for EOSU.
ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for EOSU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for EOSU and 0.75% for ARMG.
Find the right allocation for EOSU and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer