PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EONGY vs. ESLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EONGY vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E.ON SE ADR (EONGY) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EONGY achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly lower than ESLT's 43.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EONGY has underperformed ESLT with an annualized return of 14.02%, while ESLT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.96% annualized return.


EONGY

1D
-0.86%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
13.49%
6M
19.62%
1Y
22.20%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
14.02%

ESLT

1D
0.83%
1M
6.13%
YTD
43.85%
6M
71.50%
1Y
98.59%
3Y*
60.25%
5Y*
45.92%
10Y*
25.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EONGY vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EONGY
E.ON SE ADR
13.49%68.77%-9.82%41.96%-25.33%30.17%7.27%11.88%-7.04%62.83%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
43.85%125.14%22.17%31.30%-4.82%34.77%-14.56%37.62%-13.22%32.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EONGY and ESLT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2007

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EONGY:

$54.53B

ESLT:

$39.95B

EPS

EONGY:

$1.33

ESLT:

$12.36

PE Ratio

EONGY:

15.74

ESLT:

67.15

PEG Ratio

EONGY:

0.09

ESLT:

3.18

PS Ratio

EONGY:

0.72

ESLT:

4.80

PB Ratio

EONGY:

2.49

ESLT:

9.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

EONGY:

$75.47B

ESLT:

$8.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EONGY:

$15.73B

ESLT:

$2.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

EONGY:

$9.86B

ESLT:

$861.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EONGY vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EONGY
EONGY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EONGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EONGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EONGY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EONGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EONGY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EONGY vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E.ON SE ADR (EONGY) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EONGYESLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.39

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.82

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

10.82

-6.03

EONGY vs. ESLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EONGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the ESLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EONGY and ESLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EONGYESLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.35

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.39

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.89

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.62

-0.62

Drawdowns

EONGY vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EONGY drawdown since its inception was -85.09%, which is greater than ESLT's maximum drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EONGY and ESLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EONGYESLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.09%

-53.79%

-31.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-25.98%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.37%

-25.98%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.78%

-32.89%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.78%

-32.89%

-13.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.87%

-18.07%

-8.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.06%

-13.92%

-47.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

9.14%

-4.50%

Volatility

EONGY vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for E.ON SE ADR (EONGY) is 7.77%, while Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a volatility of 15.36%. This indicates that EONGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EONGYESLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

15.36%

-7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.04%

33.61%

-15.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

42.26%

-19.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.56%

33.13%

-8.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.16%

29.13%

-3.97%

Dividends

EONGY vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison

EONGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than ESLT's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EONGY
E.ON SE ADR
3.19%3.27%4.98%4.06%5.22%2.91%3.33%3.39%2.77%4.35%29.92%5.47%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.37%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%

Financials

EONGY vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between E.ON SE ADR and Elbit Systems Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
22.18B
2.19B
(EONGY) Total Revenue
(ESLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EONGY vs. ESLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between E.ON SE ADR and Elbit Systems Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
12.5%
25.2%
Portfolio components
EONGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, E.ON SE ADR reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 22.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.

ESLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

EONGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, E.ON SE ADR reported an operating income of 2.62B and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

ESLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

EONGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, E.ON SE ADR reported a net income of 2.27B and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

ESLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EONGY and ESLT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESLT has higher volatility (15.36%) compared to EONGY (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EONGY dropped -85.09% vs ESLT's -53.79%.

ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EONGY and ESLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer