EOD vs. PDT
Compare and contrast key facts about Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT).
EOD is managed by Wells Fargo. It was launched on Mar 28, 2007. PDT is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 14, 1989.
Performance
EOD vs. PDT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EOD vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund | 2.26% | 28.76% | 25.83% | 9.78% | -17.65% | 32.87% | -3.16% | 35.96% | -12.05% | 20.46% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 5.12% | 7.64% | 29.92% | -9.55% | -16.30% | 25.98% | -14.20% | 39.29% | -12.49% | 21.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EOD achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than PDT's 5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, EOD has outperformed PDT with an annualized return of 10.48%, while PDT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.
EOD
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 28.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
PDT
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EOD vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EOD has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EOD vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank
EOD
PDT
EOD vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EOD | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 0.61 | +0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 0.87 | +1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.14 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 0.84 | +1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.83 | 3.30 | +9.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EOD | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 0.61 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.33 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.28 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.32 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between EOD and PDT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EOD vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison
EOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, more than PDT's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund | 8.94% | 8.73% | 9.16% | 9.98% | 11.80% | 8.76% | 11.41% | 10.36% | 13.84% | 10.56% | 9.91% | 12.16% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 7.56% | 7.80% | 7.77% | 10.14% | 9.04% | 6.42% | 8.43% | 6.70% | 8.69% | 9.94% | 9.15% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
EOD vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EOD drawdown since its inception was -57.02%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOD and PDT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EOD | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.02% | -62.39% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -10.34% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -40.44% | +14.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.08% | -62.39% | +15.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -2.93% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -10.06% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 2.67% | -0.36% |
Volatility
EOD vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison
Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) at 4.21%. This indicates that EOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EOD | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.01% | 4.21% | +3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 7.16% | +3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 13.21% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 17.06% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 25.18% | -6.17% |