PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENVB vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENVB vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENVB achieves a -38.84% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 5.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ENVB has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of -73.81%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 16.08% annualized return.


ENVB

1D
-1.77%
1M
-44.36%
YTD
-38.84%
6M
-61.86%
1Y
-84.96%
3Y*
-85.38%
5Y*
-84.04%
10Y*
-73.81%

SIVR

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
5.62%
6M
28.07%
1Y
115.70%
3Y*
46.67%
5Y*
21.96%
10Y*
16.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENVB vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENVB
Enveric Biosciences Inc
-38.84%-94.37%-72.43%-37.50%-95.53%-37.16%-34.51%-48.17%-94.37%-52.38%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
5.62%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-8.96%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between ENVB and SIVR is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENVB vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENVB
ENVB Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ENVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENVB Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ENVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENVB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENVB vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENVBSIVRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

1.98

-2.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.64

2.12

-2.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.36

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

3.00

-3.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.31

6.52

-7.83

ENVB vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENVB Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENVB and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENVBSIVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

1.98

-2.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.54

0.61

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.46

0.51

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.32

-0.78

Drawdowns

ENVB vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENVB drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENVB and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENVBSIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-75.85%

-24.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.71%

-42.42%

-47.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.79%

-42.42%

-57.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.99%

-42.42%

-57.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

-42.42%

-57.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-35.56%

-64.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.06%

-47.86%

-38.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

64.53%

19.50%

+45.03%

Volatility

ENVB vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) has a higher volatility of 24.87% compared to abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) at 16.44%. This indicates that ENVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENVBSIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.87%

16.44%

+8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

135.51%

58.28%

+77.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

173.94%

58.97%

+114.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

155.93%

36.17%

+119.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

164.57%

31.86%

+132.71%

Dividends

ENVB vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENVB nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ENVB and SIVR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENVB has higher volatility (24.87%) compared to SIVR (16.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENVB dropped -100.00% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENVB and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer