ENTR.DE vs. EEAU.DE

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and EEAU.DE (BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation) are both exchange-traded funds - ENTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while EEAU.DE is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by BNP Paribas. ENTR.DE is passively managed, while EEAU.DE is actively managed. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ENTR.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EEAU.DE.

Performance

ENTR.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (EEAU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ENTR.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: 5.25%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 1Y: 32.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.67%

EEAU.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.46%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EEAU.DE BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation	€20.25K	€19.11K	€17.01K
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	€1.51K	€12.50K	€11.56K

ENTR.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	2.10%
EEAU.DE BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ENTR.DE and EEAU.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2026	0.18

Return for Risk

ENTR.DE vs. EEAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ENTR.DE

ENTR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 81
ENTR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ENTR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ENTR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ENTR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ENTR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

EEAU.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ENTR.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (EEAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENTR.DE	EEAU.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	—	—

Drawdowns

ENTR.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.89%, which is greater than EEAU.DE's maximum drawdown of -2.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENTR.DE and EEAU.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENTR.DE	EEAU.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.89%	-2.42%	-11.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.83%	-2.42%	-3.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-0.56%	-4.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ENTR.DE	EEAU.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.31%	11.94%	+5.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.27%	11.94%	+4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.27%	11.94%	+4.33%

ENTR.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENTR.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EEAU.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENTR.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENTR.DE nor EEAU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENTR.DE and EEAU.DE in my portfolio?

ENTR.DE and EEAU.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENTR.DE or EEAU.DE?

On fees, EEAU.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENTR.DE or EEAU.DE?

EEAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.

What is the main difference between ENTR.DE and EEAU.DE?

ENTR.DE is categorized as Commodities, while EEAU.DE is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: L&G and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ENTR.DE and 0.60% for EEAU.DE.