EEAU.DE vs. RMAU.L
EEAU.DE (BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation) and RMAU.L (The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - EEAU.DE is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by BNP Paribas Easy, while RMAU.L is a Commodities fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. EEAU.DE is actively managed, while RMAU.L is passively managed. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EEAU.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RMAU.L.
Performance
EEAU.DE vs. RMAU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EEAU.DE is traded in EUR, while RMAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMAU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
EEAU.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RMAU.L
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- 6M
- -19.37%
- YTD
- -3.08%
- 1Y
- 22.95%
- 3Y*
- 25.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| €19.63K | €19.05K | €17.47K | |
| €200.58K | €328.15K | €560.56K |
EEAU.DE vs. RMAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EEAU.DE BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation | 5.35% |
RMAU.L The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEAU.DE and RMAU.L is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2026 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEAU.DE vs. RMAU.L — Risk / Return Rank
EEAU.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RMAU.L
EEAU.DE vs. RMAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (EEAU.DE) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEAU.DE | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEAU.DE vs. RMAU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEAU.DE drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, smaller than the maximum RMAU.L drawdown of -23.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEAU.DE and RMAU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEAU.DE | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -23.13% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -21.82% | +20.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -6.41% | +5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.59% | — |
Volatility
EEAU.DE vs. RMAU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEAU.DE | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.06% | 25.89% | -14.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 17.33% | -6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 17.36% | -6.30% |
EEAU.DE vs. RMAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEAU.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RMAU.L's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEAU.DE vs. RMAU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EEAU.DE nor RMAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EEAU.DE and RMAU.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMAU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMAU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EEAU.DE.
EEAU.DE is categorized as Systematic Trend, while RMAU.L is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas Easy and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EEAU.DE and 0.22% for RMAU.L.
Find the right allocation for EEAU.DE and RMAU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer