ENR vs. LMT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT).

Performance

ENR vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ENR vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc.	-16.35%	-40.09%	14.36%	-2.18%	-13.19%	-2.22%	-13.75%	14.30%	-3.85%	10.10%
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	25.62%	2.47%	10.02%	-4.31%	40.48%	3.15%	-6.49%	52.55%	-16.35%	31.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ENR : $1.12B LMT : $140.16B
EPS ENR : $3.05 LMT : $21.53
PE Ratio ENR : 5.39 LMT : 28.07
PS Ratio ENR : 0.38 LMT : 1.88
PB Ratio ENR : 7.95 LMT : 20.85
Total Revenue (TTM) ENR : $3.00B LMT : $75.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) ENR : $1.20B LMT : $7.62B
EBITDA (TTM) ENR : $581.10M LMT : $8.77B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENR achieves a -16.35% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 25.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ENR has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of -5.78%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.

ENR

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -23.95%
• YTD: -16.35%
• 6M: -32.02%
• 1Y: -42.12%
• 3Y*: -18.69%
• 5Y*: -16.23%
• 10Y*: -5.78%

LMT

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -7.67%
• YTD: 25.62%
• 6M: 22.63%
• 1Y: 38.99%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 13.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ENR vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENR

ENR Risk / Return Rank: 7
ENR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
ENR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ENR Omega Ratio Rank: 10
ENR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ENR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

LMT

LMT Risk / Return Rank: 82
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENR vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENR	LMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.82	1.47	-2.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	1.90	-3.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.28	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	2.61	-3.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.70	6.73	-8.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENR vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENR Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENR and LMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENR	LMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.82	1.47	-2.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.47	0.59	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.16	0.57	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.39	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between ENR and LMT is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ENR vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

ENR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, more than LMT's 2.23% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc.	7.31%	6.03%	3.44%	3.79%	3.58%	2.99%	2.84%	2.39%	2.59%	2.32%	2.30%	2.94%
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	2.23%	2.76%	2.62%	2.68%	2.34%	2.98%	2.76%	2.31%	3.13%	2.32%	2.71%	2.83%

Drawdowns

ENR vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENR drawdown since its inception was -83.81%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENR and LMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENR	LMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.81%	-79.29%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.96%	-15.56%	-27.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.61%	-31.79%	-28.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.08%	-36.67%	-30.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.81%	-10.69%	-73.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.56%	-26.87%	-13.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.47%	6.04%	+18.43%

Volatility

ENR vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 6.40%. This indicates that ENR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENR	LMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.49%	6.40%	+6.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.40%	18.63%	+16.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.62%	26.74%	+24.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.40%	22.57%	+11.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.10%	23.53%	+12.57%

Financials

ENR vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ENR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energizer Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 256.60M and revenue of 778.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 20.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.4%.

ENR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energizer Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 99.50M and revenue of 778.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 20.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

ENR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energizer Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -3.40M and revenue of 778.90M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.34B and revenue of 20.33B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.