PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ENR vs. BOND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ENR and BOND is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

ENR vs. BOND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
16.72%
-0.72%
ENR
BOND

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ENR:

0.52

BOND:

0.34

Sortino Ratio

ENR:

0.93

BOND:

0.50

Omega Ratio

ENR:

1.12

BOND:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

ENR:

0.26

BOND:

0.15

Martin Ratio

ENR:

1.49

BOND:

0.95

Ulcer Index

ENR:

8.72%

BOND:

1.88%

Daily Std Dev

ENR:

24.93%

BOND:

5.35%

Max Drawdown

ENR:

-56.40%

BOND:

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

ENR:

-34.53%

BOND:

-8.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENR achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's -1.25% return.


ENR

YTD

-0.34%

1M

-5.39%

6M

16.71%

1Y

12.44%

5Y*

-3.59%

10Y*

N/A

BOND

YTD

-1.25%

1M

-2.04%

6M

-0.71%

1Y

1.48%

5Y*

-0.26%

10Y*

1.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ENR vs. BOND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ENR is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ENR is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ENR is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ENR is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ENR is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ENR is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BOND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BOND is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BOND is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BOND is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BOND is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BOND is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BOND is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ENR vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ENR, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.520.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for ENR, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.930.50
The chart of Omega ratio for ENR, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.121.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for ENR, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.260.15
The chart of Martin ratio for ENR, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.001.490.95
ENR
BOND

The current ENR Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the BOND Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENR and BOND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.52
0.34
ENR
BOND

Dividends

ENR vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison

ENR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than BOND's 5.08% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ENR
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
3.45%3.44%3.79%3.58%2.99%2.84%2.39%2.59%2.32%2.30%1.47%0.00%
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF
5.08%5.02%4.78%3.44%2.58%2.66%3.38%3.47%2.87%2.85%4.14%4.13%

Drawdowns

ENR vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENR drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, which is greater than BOND's maximum drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENR and BOND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-34.53%
-8.26%
ENR
BOND

Volatility

ENR vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison

Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) at 1.35%. This indicates that ENR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.89%
1.35%
ENR
BOND
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab