ENR vs. BOND
ENR (Energizer Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while BOND (PIMCO Active Bond ETF) is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, ENR returned -4.45%/yr vs 2.22%/yr for BOND. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENR vs. BOND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENR achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ENR has underperformed BOND with an annualized return of -4.45%, while BOND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.22% annualized return.
ENR
- 1D
- 4.31%
- 1M
- 23.87%
- YTD
- 16.88%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 18.52%
- 3Y*
- -6.99%
- 5Y*
- -8.08%
- 10Y*
- -4.45%
BOND
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 5.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.60%
- 10Y*
- 2.22%
ENR vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | 16.88% | -40.09% | 14.36% | -2.18% | -13.19% | -2.22% | -13.75% | 14.30% | -3.85% | 10.10% |
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 1.31% | 8.39% | 2.77% | 6.48% | -14.57% | -0.77% | 7.80% | 8.54% | 0.08% | 4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENR and BOND is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, ENR and BOND have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENR vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank
ENR
BOND
ENR vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENR | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.27 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.98 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | 5.97 | -5.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENR vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENR drawdown since its inception was -84.00%, which is greater than BOND's maximum drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENR and BOND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENR | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.00% | -19.71% | -64.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.62% | -3.01% | -40.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.12% | -6.12% | -50.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.12% | -19.71% | -36.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.46% | -19.71% | -47.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.38% | -0.75% | -76.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.91% | -3.49% | -37.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.59% | 1.00% | +25.59% |
Volatility
ENR vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) has a higher volatility of 10.41% compared to PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) at 1.41%. This indicates that ENR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENR | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.41% | 1.41% | +9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.80% | 3.08% | +28.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.17% | 4.00% | +49.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.69% | 5.79% | +29.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.60% | 5.10% | +31.50% |
Dividends
ENR vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison
ENR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than BOND's 5.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 5.14% | 5.11% | 5.02% | 4.06% | 3.44% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 3.18% | 2.87% | 2.85% | 4.14% |
ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | 5.33% | 6.03% | 3.44% | 3.79% | 3.58% | 2.99% | 2.84% | 2.39% | 2.59% | 2.32% | 2.30% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENR and BOND have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENR has higher volatility (10.41%) compared to BOND (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENR dropped -84.00% vs BOND's -19.71%.
BOND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENR and BOND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer