ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ENOA.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and MIVU.DE (Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ENOA.DE tracks the MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE while MIVU.DE tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ENOA.DE returned 13.15%/yr vs 8.13%/yr for MIVU.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENOA.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for MIVU.DE.

Performance

ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENOA.DE achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than MIVU.DE's 2.88% return.

ENOA.DE

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 4.58%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 6M: 10.37%
• 1Y: 24.56%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: —

MIVU.DE

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 2.88%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 3.11%
• 3Y*: 8.40%
• 5Y*: 8.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ENOA.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF	11.11%	3.55%	30.16%	20.47%	-15.59%	38.32%	9.00%	34.01%	-12.16%
MIVU.DE Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF	2.88%	-3.87%	22.89%	5.36%	-4.28%	31.88%	-5.36%	30.00%	-5.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ENOA.DE and MIVU.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2018	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between ENOA.DE and MIVU.DE has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOA.DE

ENOA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 63
ENOA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ENOA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ENOA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ENOA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ENOA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

MIVU.DE

MIVU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 14
MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MIVU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MIVU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MIVU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MIVU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENOA.DE	MIVU.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	0.28	+1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	0.46	+2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.05	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	0.52	+2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	1.15	+9.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOA.DE and MIVU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENOA.DE	MIVU.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	0.28	+1.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.68	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	0.60	-1.07

Drawdowns

ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOA.DE drawdown since its inception was -96.01%, which is greater than MIVU.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOA.DE and MIVU.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENOA.DE	MIVU.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.01%	-32.69%	-63.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-4.83%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.02%	-14.89%	-9.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.02%	-14.89%	-9.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.22%	-6.68%	-80.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.96%	-6.16%	-69.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.20%	+0.02%

Volatility

ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENOA.DE	MIVU.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	2.83%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.75%	6.02%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	8.94%	+2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.40%	11.89%	+3.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.63%	13.97%	+21.66%

ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENOA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MIVU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ENOA.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENOA.DE nor MIVU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENOA.DE and MIVU.DE in my portfolio?

ENOA.DE and MIVU.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENOA.DE or MIVU.DE?

On fees, ENOA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENOA.DE or MIVU.DE?

ENOA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MIVU.DE.

What is the main difference between ENOA.DE and MIVU.DE?

ENOA.DE tracks MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE, while MIVU.DE tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ENOA.DE and 0.18% for MIVU.DE.