PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENOA.DE is traded in EUR, while ESEA.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ESEA.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ENOA.DE having a 11.11% return and ESEA.DE slightly higher at 11.31%.


ENOA.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
5.49%
YTD
11.11%
6M
10.93%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*

ESEA.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
5.20%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.29%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ENOA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF
11.11%3.55%30.16%20.47%-15.59%38.32%9.00%11.31%
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.31%4.18%32.44%22.22%-14.52%41.11%7.15%11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ENOA.DE and ESEA.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2019

0.95

The correlation between ENOA.DE and ESEA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOA.DE
ENOA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ENOA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ESEA.DE
ESEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENOA.DEESEA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.53

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

12.07

-0.98

ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOA.DE and ESEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENOA.DEESEA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.04

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.90

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

0.88

-1.35

Drawdowns

ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOA.DE drawdown since its inception was -96.01%, which is greater than ESEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOA.DE and ESEA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENOA.DEESEA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.01%

-33.64%

-62.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

-7.19%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.02%

-22.79%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.02%

-22.79%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.22%

-0.41%

-86.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.96%

-4.87%

-71.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.10%

+0.12%

Volatility

ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) is 2.73%, while BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that ENOA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENOA.DEESEA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

3.03%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

8.65%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

12.45%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

15.91%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.63%

17.81%

+17.82%

ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ENOA.DE and ESEA.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ENOA.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

ENOA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ENOA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
1.06%0.76%0.65%0.00%1.08%0.64%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ENOA.DE and ESEA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENOA.DE and ESEA.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

ENOA.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ESEA.DE is S&P 500. ENOA.DE tracks MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE, while ESEA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENOA.DE and ESEA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer