ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ENOA.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and EMEC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - ENOA.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE, while EMEC.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the ECPI Circular Economy Leaders Equity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ENOA.DE returned 13.15%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for EMEC.DE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENOA.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EMEC.DE.

Performance

ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ENOA.DE having a 11.11% return and EMEC.DE slightly lower at 10.95%.

ENOA.DE

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 5.49%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 6M: 10.93%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: —

EMEC.DE

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 10.95%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 21.09%
• 3Y*: 11.29%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ENOA.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF	11.11%	3.55%	30.16%	20.47%	-15.59%	38.32%	9.00%	17.22%
EMEC.DE BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR	10.95%	5.92%	10.86%	19.48%	-12.91%	37.20%	8.36%	18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ENOA.DE and EMEC.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019	0.85

The correlation between ENOA.DE and EMEC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOA.DE

ENOA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 63
ENOA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ENOA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ENOA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ENOA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ENOA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

EMEC.DE

EMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 52
EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
EMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
EMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENOA.DE	EMEC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.73	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.53	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.31	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	2.64	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	9.05	+2.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOA.DE and EMEC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENOA.DE	EMEC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	1.73	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.67	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	0.82	-1.30

Drawdowns

ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOA.DE drawdown since its inception was -96.01%, which is greater than EMEC.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOA.DE and EMEC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENOA.DE	EMEC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.01%	-30.18%	-65.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-7.95%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.02%	-20.78%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.02%	-20.78%	-3.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.22%	-0.24%	-86.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.96%	-5.05%	-70.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.32%	-0.10%

Volatility

ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) is 2.73%, while BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that ENOA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENOA.DE	EMEC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	3.47%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.75%	8.86%	-1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	12.15%	-0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.40%	14.05%	+1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.63%	16.00%	+19.63%

ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENOA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEC.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENOA.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENOA.DE nor EMEC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENOA.DE and EMEC.DE in my portfolio?

ENOA.DE and EMEC.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENOA.DE or EMEC.DE?

On fees, ENOA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENOA.DE or EMEC.DE?

ENOA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EMEC.DE.

What is the main difference between ENOA.DE and EMEC.DE?

ENOA.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMEC.DE is Global Equities. ENOA.DE tracks MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE, while EMEC.DE tracks ECPI Circular Economy Leaders Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ENOA.DE and 0.30% for EMEC.DE.