PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESEA.DE vs. DYNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESEA.DE vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESEA.DE achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 11.93% return.


ESEA.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
4.51%
YTD
10.05%
6M
10.99%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*

DYNF

1D
0.34%
1M
5.19%
YTD
11.93%
6M
11.85%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESEA.DE vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.05%17.58%24.90%26.00%-19.21%29.94%17.69%11.71%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
11.93%20.00%30.29%36.25%-20.27%22.12%13.47%9.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ESEA.DE and DYNF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2019

0.58

The correlation between ESEA.DE and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESEA.DE vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEA.DE
ESEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEA.DE vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESEA.DEDYNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.57

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

17.29

-2.97

ESEA.DE vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEA.DE and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESEA.DEDYNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.48

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.87

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.83

+0.07

Drawdowns

ESEA.DE vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, roughly equal to the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA.DE and DYNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESEA.DEDYNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.14%

-34.72%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-8.67%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-18.70%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-28.65%

+4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.24%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-5.97%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.78%

+0.14%

Volatility

ESEA.DE vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) have volatilities of 3.09% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESEA.DEDYNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

3.21%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

9.55%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

12.44%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

17.49%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

19.90%

-1.97%

ESEA.DE vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESEA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESEA.DE vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

ESEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than DYNF's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
0.88%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
1.06%0.76%0.65%0.00%1.08%0.64%0.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESEA.DE and DYNF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESEA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DYNF.

ESEA.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while DYNF is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESEA.DE and 0.30% for DYNF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESEA.DE and DYNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer