ENOA.DE vs. ESAP.DE
ENOA.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and ESAP.DE (BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - ENOA.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE, while ESAP.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ENOA.DE returned 13.15%/yr vs 14.69%/yr for ESAP.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
ENOA.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENOA.DE is traded in EUR, while ESAP.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ESAP.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ENOA.DE having a 11.11% return and ESAP.DE slightly higher at 11.28%.
ENOA.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- —
ESAP.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 11.26%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.69%
- 10Y*
- —
ENOA.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOA.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 11.11% | 3.55% | 30.16% | 20.47% | -15.59% | 38.32% | 9.00% | 3.54% |
ESAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD | 11.29% | 4.09% | 32.39% | 23.18% | -14.49% | 41.14% | 7.12% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENOA.DE and ESAP.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ENOA.DE and ESAP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENOA.DE vs. ESAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ENOA.DE
ESAP.DE
ENOA.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENOA.DE | ESAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.55 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | 12.14 | -1.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENOA.DE | ESAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.03 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.91 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.84 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
ENOA.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENOA.DE drawdown since its inception was -96.01%, which is greater than ESAP.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOA.DE and ESAP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENOA.DE | ESAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.01% | -33.74% | -62.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.70% | -7.14% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.02% | -22.82% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.02% | -22.82% | -1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.22% | -0.42% | -86.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.96% | -4.99% | -70.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.09% | +0.13% |
Volatility
ENOA.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) is 2.73%, while BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that ENOA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENOA.DE | ESAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 3.01% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.75% | 8.64% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 12.50% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 15.93% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.63% | 17.80% | +17.83% |
ENOA.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ENOA.DE and ESAP.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ENOA.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENOA.DE nor ESAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ENOA.DE and ESAP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENOA.DE and ESAP.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
ENOA.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ESAP.DE is S&P 500. ENOA.DE tracks MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE, while ESAP.DE tracks S&P 500 Index.
Find the right allocation for ENOA.DE and ESAP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer