EMEC.DE vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EMEC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEC.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the ECPI Circular Economy Leaders Equity, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMEC.DE returned 9.71%/yr vs 14.14%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMEC.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

EMEC.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EMEC.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEC.DE achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.58% return.

EMEC.DE

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 14.54%
• 1Y: 26.97%
• 3Y*: 12.08%
• 5Y*: 9.71%
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -3.35%
• YTD: 3.58%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: 17.33%
• 3Y*: 20.51%
• 5Y*: 14.14%
• 10Y*: 18.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEC.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMEC.DE BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR	13.70%	5.93%	10.84%	19.49%	-12.90%	37.20%	8.39%	12.10%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	3.58%	3.56%	43.86%	45.60%	-27.58%	37.70%	27.67%	13.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEC.DE and SCHG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2019	0.43

Return for Risk

EMEC.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEC.DE

EMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 25
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEC.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMEC.DE	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.07	+1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	1.47	+1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.20	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	1.11	+2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.83	3.17	+8.66

EMEC.DE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEC.DE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMEC.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEC.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.23%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEC.DE and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEC.DE	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.23%	-31.88%	+1.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.96%	-15.64%	+7.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.82%	-28.18%	+7.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.82%	-30.34%	+9.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-5.31%	+5.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.01%	-5.23%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	5.48%	-3.21%

Volatility

EMEC.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) is 2.78%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that EMEC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMEC.DE	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	5.14%	-2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	11.64%	-2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.23%	16.25%	-4.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.10%	22.05%	-7.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.94%	21.90%	-5.96%

EMEC.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMEC.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

EMEC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMEC.DE BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.40%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEC.DE and SCHG in my portfolio?

EMEC.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMEC.DE or SCHG?

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMEC.DE or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EMEC.DE.

What is the main difference between EMEC.DE and SCHG?

EMEC.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. EMEC.DE tracks ECPI Circular Economy Leaders Equity, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EMEC.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.