ENOA.DE vs. 4UBI.DE
ENOA.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and 4UBI.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ENOA.DE tracks the MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE while 4UBI.DE tracks the MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ENOA.DE returned 13.15%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for 4UBI.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENOA.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for 4UBI.DE.
Performance
ENOA.DE vs. 4UBI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENOA.DE achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBI.DE's 14.39% return.
ENOA.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBI.DE
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 14.39%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- —
ENOA.DE vs. 4UBI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOA.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 11.11% | 3.55% | 30.16% | 20.47% | -15.59% | 38.32% | 18.12% |
4UBI.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 14.39% | -1.05% | 26.19% | 28.05% | -21.21% | 43.58% | 18.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENOA.DE and 4UBI.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ENOA.DE and 4UBI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENOA.DE vs. 4UBI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ENOA.DE
4UBI.DE
ENOA.DE vs. 4UBI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENOA.DE | 4UBI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.29 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 1.17 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | 2.16 | +8.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENOA.DE | 4UBI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 0.93 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.65 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.84 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
ENOA.DE vs. 4UBI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENOA.DE drawdown since its inception was -96.01%, which is greater than 4UBI.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOA.DE and 4UBI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENOA.DE | 4UBI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.01% | -24.63% | -71.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.70% | -20.21% | +12.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.02% | -24.63% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.02% | -24.63% | +0.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.22% | -2.14% | -85.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.96% | -7.53% | -68.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 10.95% | -8.73% |
Volatility
ENOA.DE vs. 4UBI.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (ENOA.DE) is 2.73%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBI.DE) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that ENOA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4UBI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENOA.DE | 4UBI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 3.91% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.75% | 9.67% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 25.41% | -13.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 19.14% | -3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.63% | 18.82% | +16.81% |
ENOA.DE vs. 4UBI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENOA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 4UBI.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ENOA.DE vs. 4UBI.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENOA.DE nor 4UBI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENOA.DE and 4UBI.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENOA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENOA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for 4UBI.DE.
ENOA.DE tracks MSCI North America ESG Filtered Min TE, while 4UBI.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ENOA.DE and 0.19% for 4UBI.DE.
Find the right allocation for ENOA.DE and 4UBI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer