PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENI.MI vs. GPN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENI.MI vs. GPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Eni S.p.A. (ENI.MI) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENI.MI is traded in EUR, while GPN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GPN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENI.MI achieves a 48.39% return, which is significantly higher than GPN's -12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ENI.MI has outperformed GPN with an annualized return of 12.23%, while GPN has yielded a comparatively lower -0.89% annualized return.


ENI.MI

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.03%
YTD
48.39%
6M
48.74%
1Y
85.61%
3Y*
29.38%
5Y*
25.78%
10Y*
12.23%

GPN

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
-12.35%
6M
-13.47%
1Y
-13.61%
3Y*
-13.93%
5Y*
-17.49%
10Y*
-0.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENI.MI vs. GPN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENI.MI
Eni S.p.A.
48.39%32.30%-8.72%23.40%16.20%52.36%-33.91%6.73%4.79%-5.53%
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
-14.85%-38.40%-5.09%25.15%-21.32%-32.19%8.74%81.26%7.75%26.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ENI.MI and GPN is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.20

The correlation between ENI.MI and GPN shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENI.MI vs. GPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENI.MI
ENI.MI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ENI.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENI.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENI.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ENI.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENI.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

GPN
GPN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENI.MI vs. GPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eni S.p.A. (ENI.MI) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENI.MIGPNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

0.97

+0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.01

-0.47

+7.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.32

-0.95

+29.27

ENI.MI vs. GPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENI.MI Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is higher than the GPN Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENI.MI and GPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENI.MIGPNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82

-0.35

+4.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

-0.48

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

-0.03

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.25

+0.12

Drawdowns

ENI.MI vs. GPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENI.MI drawdown since its inception was -59.77%, smaller than the maximum GPN drawdown of -70.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENI.MI and GPN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENI.MIGPNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.77%

-70.57%

+10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-28.95%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.50%

-57.26%

+33.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

-65.78%

+39.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.77%

-70.57%

+10.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-68.66%

+63.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.01%

-19.44%

+5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

14.28%

-11.17%

Volatility

ENI.MI vs. GPN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eni S.p.A. (ENI.MI) is 7.51%, while Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that ENI.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENI.MIGPNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

11.03%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.71%

30.25%

-9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.05%

39.09%

-16.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.54%

36.37%

-12.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.34%

34.63%

-8.29%

Dividends

ENI.MI vs. GPN - Dividend Comparison

ENI.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than GPN's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENI.MI
Eni S.p.A.
4.48%6.32%7.41%5.93%6.55%5.48%6.43%6.07%5.96%5.80%5.17%6.96%
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
1.55%1.29%0.89%0.79%1.01%0.66%0.36%0.12%0.04%0.04%0.06%0.06%

Financials

ENI.MI vs. GPN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eni S.p.A. and Global Payments Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ENI.MI values in EUR, GPN values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ENI.MI and GPN have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENI.MI and GPN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer