ENHI vs. XIDV
ENHI (iShares Enhanced International Active ETF) and XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ENHI is actively managed, while XIDV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ENHI charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XIDV.
Performance
ENHI vs. XIDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ENHI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XIDV
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 1Y
- 33.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 40.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.84K | $460.27K | $161.82K | |
| $193.03K | $150.10K | $420.16K |
ENHI vs. XIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ENHI iShares Enhanced International Active ETF | 11.65% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 12.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHI and XIDV is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHI vs. XIDV — Risk / Return Rank
ENHI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XIDV
ENHI vs. XIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced International Active ETF (ENHI) and Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENHI | XIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENHI vs. XIDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHI drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, smaller than the maximum XIDV drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHI and XIDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHI | XIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -12.15% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.81% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -1.38% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.31% | — |
Volatility
ENHI vs. XIDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHI | XIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.45% | 12.57% | +7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 14.58% | +5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 14.58% | +5.87% |
ENHI vs. XIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHI has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than XIDV's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ENHI vs. XIDV - Dividend Comparison
ENHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than XIDV's 5.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ENHI iShares Enhanced International Active ETF | 1.17% | 0.00% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 5.75% | 4.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENHI and XIDV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIDV is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIDV is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for ENHI.
XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 1.17% for ENHI.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for ENHI and 0.19% for XIDV.
Find the right allocation for ENHI and XIDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer