PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENGE.L vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENGE.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENGE.L is traded in GBP, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENGE.L achieves a 33.47% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.54% return.


ENGE.L

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.77%
YTD
33.47%
6M
31.39%
1Y
58.60%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-1.98%
1M
2.40%
YTD
9.54%
6M
8.11%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
18.67%
5Y*
14.75%
10Y*
16.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENGE.L vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ENGE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
33.47%20.13%-9.19%5.91%21.28%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.54%9.43%27.16%20.01%-8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ENGE.L and VOO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.10

The correlation between ENGE.L and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENGE.L vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENGE.L
ENGE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENGE.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENGE.LVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

3.68

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.51

14.08

+0.43

ENGE.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENGE.L and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENGE.LVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.43

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.94

-0.22

Drawdowns

ENGE.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENGE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGE.L and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENGE.LVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-26.09%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-7.66%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.54%

-21.93%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-1.98%

-5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-3.30%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

2.00%

+2.01%

Volatility

ENGE.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.29%. This indicates that ENGE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENGE.LVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.22%

3.29%

+4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

8.37%

+10.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.37%

11.62%

+10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.66%

15.79%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.66%

18.10%

+4.56%

ENGE.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENGE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ENGE.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ENGE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENGE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENGE.L and VOO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ENGE.L.

ENGE.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ENGE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ENGE.L and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENGE.L and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer