ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ENGE.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) and NCLP.L (WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Energy Equities funds - ENGE.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while NCLP.L tracks the WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ENGE.L returned 58.37% vs 78.50% for NCLP.L. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. ENGE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for NCLP.L.

Performance

ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ENGE.L is traded in GBP, while NCLP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NCLP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENGE.L achieves a 33.47% return, which is significantly higher than NCLP.L's 17.09% return.

ENGE.L

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: 33.47%
• 6M: 29.58%
• 1Y: 58.37%
• 3Y*: 17.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NCLP.L

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -8.79%
• YTD: 17.09%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 78.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ENGE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF	33.47%	14.12%
NCLP.L WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	17.09%	94.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ENGE.L and NCLP.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENGE.L

ENGE.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ENGE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ENGE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ENGE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ENGE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

NCLP.L

NCLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 50
NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
NCLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
NCLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
NCLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
NCLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENGE.L	NCLP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	1.73	+0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.29	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.28	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.93	2.90	+2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.51	7.54	+6.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENGE.L and NCLP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENGE.L	NCLP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	1.73	+0.87
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	2.11	-1.39

Drawdowns

ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENGE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum NCLP.L drawdown of -26.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGE.L and NCLP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENGE.L	NCLP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.54%	-26.96%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-26.96%	+15.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.24%	-15.07%	+7.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-7.53%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.01%	10.38%	-6.37%

Volatility

ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) is 8.22%, while WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that ENGE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENGE.L	NCLP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.22%	12.79%	-4.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.02%	31.79%	-12.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.37%	45.11%	-22.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.66%	45.42%	-22.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.66%	45.42%	-22.76%

ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENGE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NCLP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENGE.L vs. NCLP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENGE.L nor NCLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENGE.L and NCLP.L in my portfolio?

ENGE.L and NCLP.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENGE.L or NCLP.L?

On fees, ENGE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENGE.L or NCLP.L?

ENGE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for NCLP.L.

What is the main difference between ENGE.L and NCLP.L?

ENGE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while NCLP.L tracks WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ENGE.L and 0.45% for NCLP.L.