ENGE.L vs. IUES.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L).
ENGE.L and IUES.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENGE.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Dec 5, 2014. IUES.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both ENGE.L and IUES.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ENGE.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENGE.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 37.44% | 20.13% | -9.19% | 5.91% | 21.28% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 33.79% | 1.99% | 5.69% | -5.60% | 26.70% |
Different Trading Currencies
ENGE.L is traded in GBP, while IUES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENGE.L achieves a 37.44% return, which is significantly higher than IUES.L's 33.79% return.
ENGE.L
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- 13.50%
- YTD
- 37.44%
- 6M
- 43.40%
- 1Y
- 46.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUES.L
- 1D
- -6.31%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 33.79%
- 6M
- 36.74%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- 24.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENGE.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENGE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ENGE.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
ENGE.L
IUES.L
ENGE.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENGE.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 1.14 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 1.55 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.22 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 1.98 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 5.43 | +6.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENGE.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 1.14 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.37 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENGE.L and IUES.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ENGE.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENGE.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ENGE.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENGE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGE.L and IUES.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENGE.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -66.78% | +41.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -19.01% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.48% | -6.62% | +2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -14.29% | +6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 4.26% | -0.29% |
Volatility
ENGE.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) have volatilities of 9.18% and 9.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENGE.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.18% | 9.49% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 15.39% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.83% | 23.45% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 26.51% | -4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 28.02% | -5.82% |