ENGE.L vs. ENGW.L
ENGE.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) and ENGW.L (SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from State Street tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENGE.L returned 17.62%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for ENGW.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENGE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ENGW.L.
Performance
ENGE.L vs. ENGW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENGE.L achieves a 33.47% return, which is significantly higher than ENGW.L's 30.79% return.
ENGE.L
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 33.47%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- 58.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENGW.L
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 30.79%
- 6M
- 28.06%
- 1Y
- 48.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENGE.L vs. ENGW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 33.47% | 20.13% | -9.19% | 5.91% | 21.28% |
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF | 30.79% | 7.20% | 3.55% | -2.06% | 20.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENGE.L and ENGW.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between ENGE.L and ENGW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENGE.L vs. ENGW.L — Risk / Return Rank
ENGE.L
ENGW.L
ENGE.L vs. ENGW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENGE.L | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 3.34 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | 11.05 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENGE.L | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.30 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.61 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
ENGE.L vs. ENGW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENGE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than ENGW.L's maximum drawdown of -21.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGE.L and ENGW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENGE.L | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -21.65% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -14.56% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.54% | -21.40% | -4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.24% | -7.57% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -8.76% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 4.41% | -0.40% |
Volatility
ENGE.L vs. ENGW.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) have volatilities of 8.22% and 8.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENGE.L | ENGW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 8.05% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.02% | 18.04% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.37% | 21.21% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 22.79% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 22.79% | -0.13% |
ENGE.L vs. ENGW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENGE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENGE.L vs. ENGW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENGE.L nor ENGW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENGE.L and ENGW.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENGE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENGE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENGW.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ENGE.L and 0.30% for ENGW.L.
Find the right allocation for ENGE.L and ENGW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer