PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENDW vs. TCAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENDW vs. TCAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENDW achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than TCAF's 6.51% return.


ENDW

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.86%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.08%
1Y
27.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TCAF

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.54%
YTD
6.51%
6M
6.60%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENDW vs. TCAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ENDW and TCAF is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2025

0.79

The correlation between ENDW and TCAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

ENDW vs. TCAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ENDW
TCAF

Financial Services

17.5%
6.0%

Technology

13.9%
33.7%

Industrials

13.9%
4.6%

Energy

13.2%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.6%

Real Estate

9.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

6.2%
0.1%

Communication Services

4.6%
11.4%

Healthcare

4.6%
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.3%

Utilities

3.5%
8.6%

Financial Services

ENDW
17.5%
TCAF
6.0%

Technology

ENDW
13.9%
TCAF
33.7%

Industrials

ENDW
13.9%
TCAF
4.6%

Energy

ENDW
13.2%
TCAF
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ENDW
9.6%
TCAF
10.6%

Real Estate

ENDW
9.1%
TCAF
0.1%

Basic Materials

ENDW
6.2%
TCAF
0.1%

Communication Services

ENDW
4.6%
TCAF
11.4%

Healthcare

ENDW
4.6%
TCAF
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

ENDW
4.0%
TCAF
3.3%

Utilities

ENDW
3.5%
TCAF
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENDW vs. TCAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENDW
ENDW Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ENDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENDW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ENDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENDW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENDW vs. TCAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENDWTCAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.33

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

1.82

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.69

7.28

+10.41

ENDW vs. TCAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENDW Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the TCAF Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENDW and TCAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENDWTCAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

1.80

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.50

1.26

+2.24

Drawdowns

ENDW vs. TCAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENDW drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum TCAF drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENDW and TCAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENDWTCAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-16.37%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-11.33%

+4.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.97%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-2.06%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

2.82%

-1.25%

Volatility

ENDW vs. TCAF - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) at 2.43%. This indicates that ENDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENDWTCAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.43%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.62%

8.75%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

11.47%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.00%

13.94%

-2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.00%

13.94%

-2.94%

ENDW vs. TCAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENDW has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TCAF's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENDW vs. TCAF - Dividend Comparison

ENDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than TCAF's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ENDW
Cambria Endowment Style ETF
2.18%1.91%0.00%0.00%
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.47%0.50%0.43%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENDW and TCAF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENDW has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to TCAF (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENDW dropped -6.44% vs TCAF's -16.37%.

On 1-year performance, ENDW leads with 27.79% vs 20.51% for TCAF. On fees, ENDW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TCAF has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ENDW has performed better with a 27.79% return vs 20.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENDW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for TCAF.

ENDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.47% for TCAF.

ENDW is categorized as Global Allocation, while TCAF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for ENDW and 0.31% for TCAF.

ENDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENDW and TCAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer