ENDW vs. ELM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ENDW (Cambria Endowment Style ETF) and ELM (Elm Market Navigator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENDW is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Cambria, while ELM is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Elm. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ENDW returned 25.06% vs 17.21% for ELM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENDW charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for ELM.

Performance

ENDW vs. ELM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENDW achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than ELM's 6.28% return.

ENDW

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -1.03%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ELM

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 6.28%
• 6M: 6.39%
• 1Y: 17.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENDW vs. ELM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	8.64%	29.25%
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	6.28%	17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ENDW and ELM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025	0.83

The correlation between ENDW and ELM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ENDW vs. ELM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENDW

ENDW Risk / Return Rank: 80
ENDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ENDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ENDW Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ENDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ENDW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ELM

ELM Risk / Return Rank: 56
ELM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ELM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ELM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ELM Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ELM Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENDW vs. ELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENDW	ELM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	1.77	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	2.47	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.33	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	2.30	+1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.60	9.37	+6.23

ENDW vs. ELM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENDW Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the ELM Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENDW and ELM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ENDW vs. ELM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENDW drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum ELM drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENDW and ELM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENDW	ELM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-9.02%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.44%	-7.52%	+1.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.53%	-1.76%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-1.32%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	1.84%	-0.23%

Volatility

ENDW vs. ELM - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENDW	ELM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	3.63%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	8.11%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.51%	9.79%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.27%	10.46%	+0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.27%	10.46%	+0.81%

ENDW vs. ELM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENDW has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ELM's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENDW vs. ELM - Dividend Comparison

ENDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than ELM's 2.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	2.55%	2.71%
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	2.23%	1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENDW and ELM in my portfolio?

ENDW and ELM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ENDW or ELM?

ENDW has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to ELM (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENDW dropped -6.44% vs ELM's -9.02%.

Which ETF is better, ENDW or ELM?

On 1-year performance, ENDW leads with 25.06% vs 17.21% for ELM. On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, ELM has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ENDW or ELM?

Over the 1-year period, ENDW has performed better with a 25.06% return vs 17.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENDW or ELM?

ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for ENDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ENDW or ELM?

ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.23% for ENDW.

What is the main difference between ENDW and ELM?

ENDW is categorized as Global Allocation, while ELM is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Elm. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for ENDW and 0.24% for ELM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.