EMXC vs. VITL
EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 11.14%/yr vs -6.89%/yr for VITL. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMXC vs. VITL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 26.88% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -56.92% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- 6M
- 19.25%
- YTD
- 26.88%
- 1Y
- 47.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.32%
VITL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 32.18%
- 6M
- -52.96%
- YTD
- -56.92%
- 1Y
- -63.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- -6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.48%
EMXC vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 26.88% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 23.28% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -56.92% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -27.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and VITL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.16 |
The correlation between EMXC and VITL shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
VITL
EMXC vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMXC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.80 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | -0.75 | +4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | -1.18 | +11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and VITL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -84.20% | +41.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -84.20% | +69.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -84.20% | +65.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | -84.20% | +55.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.92% | -73.75% | +59.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | -47.81% | +37.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 53.72% | -49.25% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) is 11.80%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 16.40%. This indicates that EMXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.80% | 16.40% | -4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.94% | 50.11% | -25.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.64% | 63.17% | -36.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 54.54% | -35.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 53.75% | -33.37% |
Dividends
EMXC vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.10% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC and VITL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to EMXC (11.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs VITL's -84.20%.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXC and VITL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer