EMXC vs. VITL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 11.46%/yr vs -15.28%/yr for VITL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EMXC vs. VITL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 32.33% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -68.50% return.

EMXC

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: -1.88%
• YTD: 32.33%
• 6M: 36.39%
• 1Y: 62.72%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 11.46%
• 10Y*: —

VITL

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 12.53%
• YTD: -68.50%
• 6M: -68.29%
• 1Y: -67.42%
• 3Y*: -10.77%
• 5Y*: -15.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	32.33%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	24.81%
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	-68.50%	-15.26%	140.22%	5.16%	-17.39%	-28.64%	-28.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and VITL is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020	0.17

The correlation between EMXC and VITL shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMXC vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 86
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 88

VITL

VITL Risk / Return Rank: 5
VITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
VITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
VITL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
VITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
VITL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMXC	VITL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	-1.10	+3.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	-2.06	+5.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	0.76	+0.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.37	-0.80	+5.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.27	-1.43	+18.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMXC vs. VITL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the VITL Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and VITL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMXC	VITL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	-1.10	+3.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	-0.28	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	-0.36	+0.86

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and VITL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMXC	VITL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-84.20%	+41.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-84.20%	+69.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.12%	-84.20%	+65.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-84.20%	+55.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.55%	-80.81%	+73.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.19%	-47.28%	+37.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	47.12%	-43.48%

Volatility

EMXC vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) is 12.57%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 18.45%. This indicates that EMXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMXC	VITL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.57%	18.45%	-5.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.20%	48.11%	-26.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.27%	61.49%	-38.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.82%	54.16%	-36.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	53.74%	-33.75%

Dividends

EMXC vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.13%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMXC and VITL in my portfolio?

EMXC and VITL have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMXC or VITL?

VITL has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to EMXC (12.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs VITL's -84.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.