EMXC vs. ESPO
EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 11.46%/yr vs 5.88%/yr for ESPO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
EMXC vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 32.33% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -14.87% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 32.33%
- 6M
- 36.39%
- 1Y
- 62.72%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -14.87%
- 6M
- -18.35%
- 1Y
- -15.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 32.33% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -2.71% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -14.87% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and ESPO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between EMXC and ESPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMXC vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXC
ESPO
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EMXC
ESPO
Financial Services
EMXC
ESPO
-
Industrials
EMXC
ESPO
-
Basic Materials
EMXC
ESPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMXC
ESPO
Energy
EMXC
ESPO
-
Communication Services
EMXC
ESPO
Consumer Defensive
EMXC
ESPO
-
Utilities
EMXC
ESPO
-
Healthcare
EMXC
ESPO
-
Real Estate
EMXC
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
ESPO
EMXC vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 0.88 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | -0.54 | +4.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | -0.96 | +18.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | -0.80 | +3.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.24 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.62 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -50.99% | +8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -27.81% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -27.81% | +8.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | -48.33% | +19.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -26.99% | +19.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -15.05% | +4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 15.58% | -11.94% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.84%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 4.84% | +7.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.20% | 14.65% | +6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.27% | 18.85% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 25.11% | -7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 25.74% | -5.75% |
EMXC vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXC vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than ESPO's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.13% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.46% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC and ESPO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to ESPO (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 11.46% vs 5.88% for ESPO. On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 11.46% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.46% for ESPO.
EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.55% for ESPO.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXC and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer