EMXC vs. EDIV

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index while EDIV tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 11.85%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for EDIV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

EMXC vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 32.80% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 9.97% return.

EMXC

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -3.24%
• 6M: 26.73%
• YTD: 32.80%
• 1Y: 55.63%
• 3Y*: 24.38%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: —

EDIV

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 2.05%
• 6M: 8.61%
• YTD: 9.97%
• 1Y: 14.33%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	32.80%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-12.96%	7.16%
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	9.97%	16.45%	12.75%	41.91%	-15.31%	11.21%	-9.95%	11.80%	-6.16%	7.56%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and EDIV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017	0.77

The correlation between EMXC and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXC vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMXC	EDIV
Technology	52.4%	7.6%
Financial Services	17.4%	16.4%
Industrials	6.9%	6.2%
Basic Materials	6.0%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	7.8%
Energy	3.4%	3.9%
Communication Services	3.0%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	9.4%
Utilities	1.9%	1.7%
Healthcare	1.8%	0.1%
Real Estate	0.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

EMXC vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 82
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

EDIV

EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 37
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 38
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMXC	EDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.12	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	1.65	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.21	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	1.39	+2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.40	4.06	+9.34

EMXC vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and EDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMXC	EDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-53.36%	+10.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-10.36%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.12%	-13.84%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-28.32%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.90%	-0.86%	-9.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.13%	-19.25%	+9.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	3.54%	+0.62%

Volatility

EMXC vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.16%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMXC	EDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.36%	4.16%	+8.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.76%	11.07%	+13.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.41%	12.81%	+13.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.73%	13.95%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.37%	17.31%	+3.06%

EMXC vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMXC and EDIV have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

EMXC vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than EDIV's 4.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	4.13%	4.69%	3.94%	4.26%	4.94%	3.84%	3.52%	3.83%	3.41%	2.99%	4.94%	5.33%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.00%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMXC and EDIV in my portfolio?

EMXC and EDIV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMXC or EDIV?

EMXC has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to EDIV (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

Which ETF is better, EMXC or EDIV?

On 5-year performance, EDIV leads with 12.06% vs 11.85% for EMXC. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMXC or EDIV?

Over the 5-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMXC or EDIV?

EMXC and EDIV have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMXC or EDIV?

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 2.00% for EMXC.

What is the main difference between EMXC and EDIV?

EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.