EMXC.DE vs. QDVS.DE
EMXC.DE (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc) and QDVS.DE (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMXC.DE tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while QDVS.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC.DE returned 13.66%/yr vs 5.01%/yr for QDVS.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXC.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QDVS.DE.
Performance
EMXC.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC.DE achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than QDVS.DE's 17.24% return.
EMXC.DE
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 8.39%
- YTD
- 40.23%
- 6M
- 44.14%
- 1Y
- 69.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVS.DE
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 18.99%
- 1Y
- 35.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC.DE Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc | 40.23% | 19.92% | 9.13% | 14.33% | -13.60% | 17.56% | 2.27% | 6.14% |
QDVS.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF | 17.24% | 16.78% | 11.26% | -2.12% | -12.39% | 6.97% | 6.67% | 7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC.DE and QDVS.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between EMXC.DE and QDVS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC.DE vs. QDVS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC.DE
QDVS.DE
EMXC.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.38 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.78 | 3.50 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.97 | 12.67 | +9.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 2.11 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.29 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.40 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
EMXC.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than QDVS.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.DE and QDVS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -36.51% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -10.19% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.48% | -20.83% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | -25.09% | +4.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -3.00% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -8.82% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.82% | +0.31% |
Volatility
EMXC.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) at 6.00%. This indicates that EMXC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC.DE | QDVS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.44% | 6.00% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | 13.84% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 16.93% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 16.89% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 18.68% | -0.18% |
EMXC.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMXC.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMXC.DE nor QDVS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, EMXC.DE and QDVS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QDVS.DE.
EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while QDVS.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMXC.DE and 0.25% for QDVS.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMXC.DE and QDVS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer