PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC.DE achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than 6AQQ.DE's 20.65% return.


EMXC.DE

1D
-1.80%
1M
8.39%
YTD
40.23%
6M
44.14%
1Y
69.02%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*

6AQQ.DE

1D
-0.84%
1M
9.27%
YTD
20.65%
6M
19.52%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
21.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
40.23%19.92%9.13%14.33%-13.60%17.56%2.27%6.14%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
20.65%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019

0.63

The correlation between EMXC.DE and 6AQQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMXC.DE6AQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.42

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.78

3.77

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.97

11.17

+10.80

EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC.DE and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMXC.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46

2.41

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.94

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.08

-0.39

Drawdowns

EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.DE and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXC.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-31.19%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-10.01%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.48%

-26.73%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.48%

-31.19%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-0.84%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-5.36%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.39%

-0.26%

Volatility

EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 4.40%. This indicates that EMXC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXC.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

4.40%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.23%

10.96%

+6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.85%

15.66%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

19.83%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

19.63%

-1.13%

EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMXC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMXC.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMXC.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

EMXC.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMXC.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC.DE and 6AQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer