PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMVL.L vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMVL.L vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMVL.L achieves a 45.06% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 3.48% return.


EMVL.L

1D
2.91%
1M
8.74%
YTD
45.06%
6M
49.13%
1Y
82.04%
3Y*
36.29%
5Y*
16.74%
10Y*

UUP

1D
0.07%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.48%
6M
3.56%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
3.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMVL.L vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
45.06%43.13%14.49%18.37%-16.29%5.29%7.72%17.64%-2.10%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.48%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EMVL.L and UUP is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018

-0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMVL.L vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMVL.L
EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMVL.L vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMVL.LUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.19

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.00

1.78

+5.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.34

4.74

+17.60

EMVL.L vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMVL.L and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMVL.L vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMVL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMVL.L and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMVL.LUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-22.19%

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-3.65%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.42%

-10.05%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.55%

-10.37%

-23.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-3.10%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-8.91%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

1.37%

+2.29%

Volatility

EMVL.L vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.19%. This indicates that EMVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMVL.LUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

1.19%

+9.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

4.21%

+14.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.93%

6.03%

+15.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

7.22%

+13.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

6.96%

+14.23%

EMVL.L vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMVL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMVL.L vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

EMVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.31%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMVL.L and UUP have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMVL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMVL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

EMVL.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while UUP is Currency. EMVL.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EMVL.L and 0.75% for UUP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMVL.L and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer