PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMTL vs. TNGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMTL vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMTL achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 15.21% return.


EMTL

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
3.38%

TNGY

1D
0.39%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
15.21%
6M
12.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMTL vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMTL and TNGY is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMTL vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMTL
EMTL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EMTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMTL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EMTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TNGY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMTL vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMTLTNGYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.06

EMTL vs. TNGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMTLTNGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.15

-0.41

Drawdowns

EMTL vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTL and TNGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMTLTNGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-8.86%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-3.92%

+3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-2.18%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

Volatility

EMTL vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMTLTNGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

15.70%

-13.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

15.70%

-10.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

15.70%

-11.03%

EMTL vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMTL vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison

EMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than TNGY's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
4.95%5.09%5.34%4.78%4.19%5.43%3.28%3.96%3.35%4.16%8.87%
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
3.41%2.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMTL and TNGY have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMTL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMTL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.

EMTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 3.41% for TNGY.

EMTL is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMTL and 0.85% for TNGY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMTL and TNGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer