PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMTL vs. TNGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMTL vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMTL achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 10.84% return.


EMTL

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.69%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
3.27%

TNGY

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
10.84%
6M
11.42%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMTL vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMTL and TNGY is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMTL vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMTL
EMTL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EMTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMTL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EMTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMTL Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

TNGY
TNGY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TNGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TNGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMTL vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMTLTNGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.14

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

1.31

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

3.85

+3.83

EMTL vs. TNGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the TNGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMTL and TNGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMTL vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTL and TNGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMTLTNGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-9.79%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.00%

-9.79%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-7.56%

+7.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-3.58%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

3.34%

-2.78%

Volatility

EMTL vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) is 0.73%, while Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that EMTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMTLTNGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

6.56%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

12.78%

-11.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

16.01%

-13.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.87%

16.44%

-11.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

16.44%

-11.76%

EMTL vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMTL vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison

EMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than TNGY's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
4.97%5.09%5.34%4.78%4.19%5.43%3.28%3.96%3.35%4.16%8.87%
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
3.55%2.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMTL and TNGY have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNGY has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to EMTL (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMTL dropped -22.91% vs TNGY's -9.79%.

On 1-year performance, TNGY leads with 12.82% vs 4.33% for EMTL. On fees, EMTL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, EMTL has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TNGY has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMTL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.

EMTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 3.55% for TNGY.

EMTL is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMTL and 0.85% for TNGY.

EMTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMTL and TNGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer