EMTL vs. TNGY
EMTL (SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EMTL is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while TNGY is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise Capital. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. EMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
EMTL vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMTL achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 15.21% return.
EMTL
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 3.38%
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMTL vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF | 0.74% | 4.01% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.21% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMTL and TNGY is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMTL vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
EMTL
TNGY
EMTL vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMTL | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.76 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMTL | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.15 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
EMTL vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTL and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMTL | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -8.86% | -14.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -3.92% | +3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -2.18% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | — | — |
Volatility
EMTL vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMTL | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22% | 15.70% | -13.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 15.70% | -10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 15.70% | -11.03% |
EMTL vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMTL vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
EMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than TNGY's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF | 4.95% | 5.09% | 5.34% | 4.78% | 4.19% | 5.43% | 3.28% | 3.96% | 3.35% | 4.16% | 8.87% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.41% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMTL and TNGY have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMTL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMTL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
EMTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 3.41% for TNGY.
EMTL is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMTL and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for EMTL and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer