EMSQX vs. FPADX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMSQX (Shelton Emerging Markets Fund) and FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, EMSQX returned 10.85%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for FPADX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMSQX charges 1.77%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FPADX.

Performance

EMSQX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMSQX achieves a 24.26% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 30.04% return.

EMSQX

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: 24.26%
• 6M: 26.85%
• 1Y: 51.87%
• 3Y*: 21.38%
• 5Y*: 10.85%
• 10Y*: —

FPADX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 10.70%
• YTD: 30.04%
• 6M: 32.95%
• 1Y: 58.94%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMSQX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMSQX Shelton Emerging Markets Fund	24.26%	32.98%	3.45%	15.43%	-14.33%	0.77%	44.90%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	30.04%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	30.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EMSQX and FPADX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020	0.78

The correlation between EMSQX and FPADX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMSQX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMSQX

EMSQX Risk / Return Rank: 82
EMSQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EMSQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EMSQX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EMSQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
EMSQX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMSQX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMSQX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	3.34	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	4.23	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.62	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	4.48	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.69	17.77	-3.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMSQX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMSQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMSQX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMSQX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.94	3.34	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.47	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	0.37	+0.62

Drawdowns

EMSQX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSQX drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSQX and FPADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMSQX	FPADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.96%	-39.16%	+9.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.60%	-13.28%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.66%	-16.09%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.29%	-37.00%	+9.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-13.26%	+5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	3.34%	+0.25%

Volatility

EMSQX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) is 6.79%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that EMSQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMSQX	FPADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.79%	7.57%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.64%	15.40%	-0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.00%	17.80%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	17.11%	-0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.72%	17.82%	-1.10%

EMSQX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMSQX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMSQX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

EMSQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.16%, more than FPADX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMSQX Shelton Emerging Markets Fund	13.16%	16.36%	7.85%	10.06%	1.52%	1.94%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.81%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMSQX and FPADX in my portfolio?

EMSQX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMSQX or FPADX?

FPADX has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to EMSQX (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMSQX dropped -29.96% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.