EMSQX vs. EMPTX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX).

EMSQX is managed by Shelton Capital Management. It was launched on Mar 19, 1997. EMPTX is managed by UBS. It was launched on May 30, 2018.

Performance

EMSQX vs. EMPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMSQX vs. EMPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMSQX Shelton Emerging Markets Fund	3.82%	32.98%	3.45%	15.43%	-14.33%	0.77%	44.90%
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	2.95%	43.82%	2.51%	8.92%	-25.38%	-9.36%	33.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMSQX achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than EMPTX's 2.95% return.

EMSQX

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -9.27%
• YTD: 3.82%
• 6M: 7.05%
• 1Y: 33.61%
• 3Y*: 14.47%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: —

EMPTX

• 1D: 3.14%
• 1M: -9.75%
• YTD: 2.95%
• 6M: 8.93%
• 1Y: 38.76%
• 3Y*: 17.16%
• 5Y*: 1.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMSQX vs. EMPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMSQX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than EMPTX's 0.19% expense ratio.

EMSQX

Shelton Emerging Markets Fund

EMPTX

UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund

Return for Risk

EMSQX vs. EMPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMSQX

EMSQX Risk / Return Rank: 85
EMSQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EMSQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EMSQX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EMSQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EMSQX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

EMPTX

EMPTX Risk / Return Rank: 90
EMPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EMPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EMPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
EMPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EMPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMSQX vs. EMPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMSQX	EMPTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.26	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.84	-0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.43	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.42	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.39	9.35	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMSQX vs. EMPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMSQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the EMPTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMSQX and EMPTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMSQX	EMPTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.26	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.09	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.33	+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between EMSQX and EMPTX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EMSQX vs. EMPTX - Dividend Comparison

EMSQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%, more than EMPTX's 1.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMSQX Shelton Emerging Markets Fund	15.76%	16.36%	7.85%	10.06%	1.52%	1.94%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	1.86%	1.91%	3.40%	3.20%	3.84%	11.93%	1.50%	2.75%	0.54%

Drawdowns

EMSQX vs. EMPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSQX drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum EMPTX drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSQX and EMPTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMSQX	EMPTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.96%	-46.03%	+16.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.60%	-14.50%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.29%	-41.73%	+14.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.42%	-11.81%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-18.72%	+10.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	3.94%	-0.46%

Volatility

EMSQX vs. EMPTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) is 8.37%, while UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) has a volatility of 9.66%. This indicates that EMSQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMSQX	EMPTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.37%	9.66%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.62%	13.96%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.68%	18.98%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	18.90%	-2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.48%	19.24%	-2.76%