PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMSQX vs. DEMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMSQX vs. DEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMSQX achieves a 24.26% return, which is significantly lower than DEMIX's 112.88% return.


EMSQX

1D
1.28%
1M
6.93%
YTD
24.26%
6M
26.85%
1Y
51.87%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*

DEMIX

1D
2.49%
1M
25.82%
YTD
112.88%
6M
130.33%
1Y
253.23%
3Y*
66.83%
5Y*
26.08%
10Y*
21.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMSQX vs. DEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMSQX
Shelton Emerging Markets Fund
24.26%32.98%3.45%15.43%-14.33%0.77%44.90%
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
112.88%86.79%6.52%17.59%-28.66%-2.08%33.96%

Correlation

The correlation between EMSQX and DEMIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020

0.74

The correlation between EMSQX and DEMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMSQX vs. DEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMSQX
EMSQX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EMSQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMSQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMSQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EMSQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMSQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMIX
DEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMSQX vs. DEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMSQXDEMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.88

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

12.33

-8.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.69

46.85

-32.16

EMSQX vs. DEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMSQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is lower than the DEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 6.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMSQX and DEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMSQXDEMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

6.75

-3.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.04

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.54

+0.45

Drawdowns

EMSQX vs. DEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSQX drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum DEMIX drawdown of -63.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSQX and DEMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMSQXDEMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-63.15%

+33.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.60%

-21.01%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-22.62%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.29%

-43.95%

+16.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-18.46%

+10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

5.51%

-1.92%

Volatility

EMSQX vs. DEMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shelton Emerging Markets Fund (EMSQX) is 6.79%, while Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) has a volatility of 17.10%. This indicates that EMSQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMSQXDEMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

17.10%

-10.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.64%

33.83%

-19.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.00%

38.39%

-20.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

25.33%

-8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

23.14%

-6.42%

EMSQX vs. DEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMSQX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DEMIX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMSQX vs. DEMIX - Dividend Comparison

EMSQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.16%, more than DEMIX's 8.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
8.91%18.97%1.99%2.95%1.89%3.42%0.87%0.80%0.65%1.80%0.94%0.30%
EMSQX
Shelton Emerging Markets Fund
13.16%16.36%7.85%10.06%1.52%1.94%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMSQX and DEMIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMIX has higher volatility (17.10%) compared to EMSQX (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMSQX dropped -29.96% vs DEMIX's -63.15%.

DEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.75 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMSQX and DEMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer