EMSF vs. AVXC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC).

EMSF and AVXC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMSF is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Sep 21, 2023. AVXC is a passively managed fund by Avantis Investors that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets IMI. It was launched on Mar 19, 2024.

Performance

EMSF vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMSF vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF	9.54%	19.20%	-3.74%
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	6.08%	31.45%	-0.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMSF achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than AVXC's 6.08% return.

EMSF

• 1D: 4.37%
• 1M: -9.73%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 30.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVXC

• 1D: 3.79%
• 1M: -10.21%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 14.48%
• 1Y: 42.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMSF vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMSF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.

EMSF

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF

AVXC

Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF

Return for Risk

EMSF vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMSF

EMSF Risk / Return Rank: 69
EMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
EMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

AVXC

AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 92
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMSF vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMSF	AVXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.18	-0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.82	-1.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.41	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.94	-0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	12.26	-5.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMSF vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMSF and AVXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMSF	AVXC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	2.18	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	1.01	-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between EMSF and AVXC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EMSF vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

EMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than AVXC's 1.89% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF	1.72%	1.88%	3.29%	0.02%
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	1.89%	1.97%	1.34%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EMSF vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSF drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than AVXC's maximum drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSF and AVXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMSF	AVXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-20.44%	-4.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.57%	-14.04%	-0.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.83%	-10.78%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-3.92%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	3.36%	+0.93%

Volatility

EMSF vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) has a higher volatility of 12.64% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) at 10.67%. This indicates that EMSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMSF	AVXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.64%	10.67%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.40%	14.72%	+4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.55%	19.40%	+5.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.79%	17.27%	+4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.79%	17.27%	+4.52%