EMSC vs. EMCS
EMSC (Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF) and EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMSC is actively managed, while EMCS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EMSC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCS.
Performance
EMSC vs. EMCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EMSC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EMCS
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- YTD
- 22.49%
- 1Y
- 38.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $175.68K | $2.77M | $969.19K | |
| $589.48K | $425.09K | $1.71M |
EMSC vs. EMCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EMSC Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF | -3.72% |
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | -0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMSC and EMCS is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMSC vs. EMCS — Risk / Return Rank
EMSC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMCS
EMSC vs. EMCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF (EMSC) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMSC | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMSC vs. EMCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMSC drawdown since its inception was -10.93%, smaller than the maximum EMCS drawdown of -44.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSC and EMCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMSC | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.93% | -44.86% | +33.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.52% | -11.52% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -16.42% | +11.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility
EMSC vs. EMCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMSC | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.50% | 26.74% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 21.56% | +8.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 22.15% | +8.35% |
EMSC vs. EMCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMSC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMSC vs. EMCS - Dividend Comparison
EMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 1.55% | 1.66% | 0.67% | 3.07% | 2.26% | 1.46% | 1.40% | 3.56% |
EMSC Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMSC and EMCS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for EMSC.
EMCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.00% for EMSC.
They also come from different issuers: Sophus Capital and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for EMSC and 0.15% for EMCS.
Find the right allocation for EMSC and EMCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer